|
|
View Poll Results: Patrick Mahomes II starting every game in 2017 would have been... | |||
Better for the Chiefs in both the short term and the long term. | 66 | 46.15% | |
Better for the Chiefs in the short term, but worse in the long term. | 8 | 5.59% | |
Worse for the Chiefs in the short term, but better in the long term. | 27 | 18.88% | |
Worse for the Chiefs in both the short term and the long term. | 19 | 13.29% | |
I'm incapable of thinking clearly due to my excitement about the game tomorrow. | 18 | 12.59% | |
Sorry, but I don't read English. | 5 | 3.50% | |
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-19-2019, 06:36 PM | Topic Starter |
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $3018491
VARSITY
|
Not starting Patrick Mahomes II in 2017 - good idea or bad idea?
Some of you may know that Patrick Mahomes II was drafted in 2017. He watched 15 of the 16 regular season games from the sideline, and he watched the Jeff Triplette abomination from the same locale.
My question to you, brilliant Kansas City Chiefs fans, is whether that was a good move or a bad move long term. There are many facets to consider in this situation. I'll list a few, and you will likely identify more. Would we have made the playoffs in 2017 with a Mahomes-Led Team (MLT)? Would we have gone further in the playoffs with an MLT? Would we get one more career year from Mahomes to enjoy in that situation? Mahomes learned from Alex Alex's trade value was impacted by starting in 2017. Would more film have impacted Mahomes' legendary 2018 season? Would more playing experience have impacted Mahomes' legendary 2018 season? We lost a year of Mahomes' non-billion dollar rookie contract. Would it have impacted Mahomes' chemistry with future consensus all-pro Gehrig Dieter? You'll be receiving a poll faster than Patrick Mahomes II throws to Kelce over the middle. |
Posts: 141,672
|
|
|