Another teacher/pupil sex story?

jcroft · 03-01-2005, 03:57 PM

My take:

It's wrong for a teacher, or anyone in a position of authority, to bang their students.

That having been said...

In this day and age, almost no one is a virgin past the age of 16. Most 16 year olds are having sex consentually on a regular basis. Many 16 year old girls are having consensual sex regualrly with guys over the age of 18. Some 16 year old boys are having consensual sex regularly with females over the age of 18. If you disagree with any of this, you are either in denail or completly out of touch with today's youth.

Consensual statutory "rape" on a sexually active 16 year old should not be considered anywhere near the crime that non-consensual child molestation is. There is a world of difference. A child who is raped and molested stands to have a life of problems because of it. A 16 year year old boy who bones his teacher, though, stands to lose nothing at all. I would imagine he will have not a single problem in life as a result. Of course, if the teacher gets caught, and it gets slapped all over newspapers, the 16 year old might have trouble because of THAT -- but not because of the sex itself.

I personally don't see much difference between a 16 year old boy boning a 16 year old girl and a 30 year old woman. They're both consensual, they both have equal health/pregnancy risks, and neither is likley to cause either party mental harm.

If this wasn't a teacher, I'd say neither party did anything wrong, in my mind (obviously, the law disagrees, i'm aware of that).

03-01-2005, 03:57 PM	#35
jcroft Thread-Stopper Extrodinaire Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Seattle, WA Casino cash: $10004900	My take: It's wrong for a teacher, or anyone in a position of authority, to bang their students. That having been said... In this day and age, almost no one is a virgin past the age of 16. Most 16 year olds are having sex consentually on a regular basis. Many 16 year old girls are having consensual sex regualrly with guys over the age of 18. Some 16 year old boys are having consensual sex regularly with females over the age of 18. If you disagree with any of this, you are either in denail or completly out of touch with today's youth. Consensual statutory "rape" on a sexually active 16 year old should not be considered anywhere near the crime that non-consensual child molestation is. There is a world of difference. A child who is raped and molested stands to have a life of problems because of it. A 16 year year old boy who bones his teacher, though, stands to lose nothing at all. I would imagine he will have not a single problem in life as a result. Of course, if the teacher gets caught, and it gets slapped all over newspapers, the 16 year old might have trouble because of THAT -- but not because of the sex itself. I personally don't see much difference between a 16 year old boy boning a 16 year old girl and a 30 year old woman. They're both consensual, they both have equal health/pregnancy risks, and neither is likley to cause either party mental harm. If this wasn't a teacher, I'd say neither party did anything wrong, in my mind (obviously, the law disagrees, i'm aware of that). __________________ Jeff Croft jeffcroft.com
Posts: 2,150