How Should the US Respond

Raiderhater · 09-13-2001, 08:33 PM

I have been thinking about the best way to do this, and while I don't have a whole plan, I do have the strating stages.

First we send in a SpecForc group (I prefer pure American, I don't dig this NATO talk, and for this action anyway should be only American) to bag Bin Laden (take him out alive for live torture and killing back in the states if it doesn't bring up too many tactical headaches, otherwise just kill 'em on the spot). After words you take out the taliban with a tactical missle strike follwed by US occupation of the country. While at the same time taking out the taliban, drop a nuke right on Saddam's presidential palace, followed with eventual (after it is safe to go in) occupation of the country. After this a longer term plan can start to unfold. Now i know most of you have come out against the use of nukes, but is there any way you could sign off on just this one in bahgdad? if not explain why and I'll modify the plan accordingly.

Hader,
Iraq has been a thorn in our side for too long

View Poll Results: What Should the US Do Now
All Out Nuclear War against All Backers of Islamic Terrorism	9	10.59%
Tactical Nuclear Strike Against Primary Offending Nation	4	4.71%
Non-Nuke Full Scale Invasion/Conquering of Offending Nation	32	37.65%
Massive Non Nuke Missile Strike of Offending Nation	10	11.76%
Missile Strike plus Special Forces Attack	24	28.24%
Special Forces Surgical Strike Only	6	7.06%
Negotiate with Terrorists and Arab Leaders	0	0%
Talk Tough and see what happens next	0	0%
Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll

09-13-2001, 08:33 PM	#38
Raiderhater Tried it on and it fit Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: A Webb of chaos Casino cash: $-1647979	I have been thinking about the best way to do this, and while I don't have a whole plan, I do have the strating stages. First we send in a SpecForc group (I prefer pure American, I don't dig this NATO talk, and for this action anyway should be only American) to bag Bin Laden (take him out alive for live torture and killing back in the states if it doesn't bring up too many tactical headaches, otherwise just kill 'em on the spot). After words you take out the taliban with a tactical missle strike follwed by US occupation of the country. While at the same time taking out the taliban, drop a nuke right on Saddam's presidential palace, followed with eventual (after it is safe to go in) occupation of the country. After this a longer term plan can start to unfold. Now i know most of you have come out against the use of nukes, but is there any way you could sign off on just this one in bahgdad? if not explain why and I'll modify the plan accordingly. Hader, Iraq has been a thorn in our side for too long __________________ "Serious sport has nothing to do with fair play. It is bound up with hatred, jealousy, boastfulness, and disregard of all the rules." -- George Orwell, Shooting an Elephant
Posts: 29,553