Jamaal Charles is infact an every down back

[GoHuge]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

I can live with 4 good years from a RB. Very few backs can carry the ball 320 times for more than a couple of years.



Why would this break him down faster?

I'm assuming he was referring to the higher workload for Charles if he is the best option A, B, and C. I know this sounds like a brutal thing to say, but I think we've seen it in (LJ) that a RB is only good for the four or five year rookie contract. Get what you can while the getting is good and then find another one. Unfortunately with Charles where putting miles on him when we suck. By the time this team is possibly good enough to be contending for anything he might be just about used up.
Posted via Mobile Device