Fisher to LT?

[temper11]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

So basically, you're ok with whatever they do.

as long as the team stays competitive, yes. If we are getting our shit kicked all over the field then something needs to change. 11-4 last year, had the freaking WC game won, after a 2-14 previous season. So far direction seems pretty good.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by temper11

as long as the team stays competitive, yes. If we are getting our shit kicked all over the field then something needs to change. 11-4 last year, had the freaking WC game won, after a 2-14 previous season. So far direction seems pretty good.

That's what people said for 10 years while Marty was here. Ended up pretty successful...oh wait...

[Deberg_1990]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

That's what people said for 10 years while Marty was here. Ended up pretty successful...oh wait...

I've actually thought about this alot. I'd rather go through the 90s again than what we went through from 2007- 2012.

Its a hell of alot more fun. But yes, I do agree the overall goal should be a title.

Ultimately with these picks, its not our money, risk or reputations on the line. The teams gonna do what the teams gonna do.
Posted via Mobile Device

[temper11]

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

I've actually thought about this alot. I'd rather go through the 90s again than what we went through from 2007- 2012.

Its a hell of alot more fun. But yes, I do agree the overall goal should be a title.

Ultimately with these picks, its not our money, risk or reputations on the line. The teams gonna do what the teams gonna do.
Posted via Mobile Device

Agree, you are always striving for a title, but there are so many varialbles to winning the superbowl that I think the best way to win is to just make your team as competitive as possible as consistently as possible. Get yourself in the tournament as often as you can instead of going all in for one or two years. But that's just one opinion among many I realize.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by temper11

Agree, you are always striving for a title, but there are so many varialbles to winning the superbowl that I think the best way to win is to just make your team as competitive as possible as consistently as possible. Get yourself in the tournament as often as you can instead of going all in for one or two years. But that's just one opinion among many I realize.

I'd probably be inclined to agree with you if we hadn't already tried that approach...

And failed...

[duncan_idaho]

Originally Posted by temper11

Agree, you are always striving for a title, but there are so many varialbles to winning the superbowl that I think the best way to win is to just make your team as competitive as possible as consistently as possible. Get yourself in the tournament as often as you can instead of going all in for one or two years. But that's just one opinion among many I realize.

Hmm... And what's the best way to do that?

Hint: It's something the Chiefs have not legitimately tried to do for 3 decades. And the brightest ray of hope re: the Dorsey and Reid regime is that they supposedly see the importance of it.

[temper11]

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho

Hmm... And what's the best way to do that?

Hint: It's something the Chiefs have not legitimately tried to do for 3 decades. And the brightest ray of hope re: the Dorsey and Reid regime is that they supposedly see the importance of it.

uhhh... I think you agree with me, but I couldn't tell through the condescending tone.

[duncan_idaho]

Originally Posted by temper11

uhhh... I think you agree with me, but I couldn't tell through the condescending tone.

Sarcasm, not condescension.