Reid/Dorsey safe for 2016.

[FloridaMan88]

I am not against Clark committing to Dorsey/Reid long term, but he needs to demand some changes to the coaching staff and force Reid to give up play-calling duties, unless the Chiefs somehow turn their season around during the final 8 games.

[TEX]

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88

I am not against Clark committing to Dorsey/Reid long term, but he needs to demand some changes to the coaching staff and force Reid to give up play-calling duties, unless the Chiefs somehow turn their season around during the final 8 games.

Regardless, a franchise QB must finally be drafted and developed on their watch.

[Discuss Thrower]

Originally Posted by TEX

Regardless, a franchise QB must finally be drafted and developed on their watch.

Better get over that idea sooner than later.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by TEX

Regardless, a franchise QB must finally be drafted and developed on their watch.

We're slowly ****ing ourselves out of the position to draft one. And good luck trading up for one.

[RunKC]

We need to start hitting our draft choices more often like the Royals..

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88

I am not against Clark committing to Dorsey/Reid long term, but he needs to demand some changes to the coaching staff and force Reid to give up play-calling duties, unless the Chiefs somehow turn their season around during the final 8 games.

Clarks comments this week don't sound promising. He's spinning this as if we are turning this ship around because we've won a few pretty meaningless games. And it sounds like we're keeping guys like Sean Smith around to make a desperate run even though we know Smith won't be back next year.

This is on Clark. Reid is going to absorb power until somebody stops him.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Clarks comments this week don't sound promising. He's spinning this as if we are turning this ship around because we've won a few pretty meaningless games. And it sounds like we're keeping guys like Sean Smith around to make a desperate run even though we know Smith won't be back next year.

This is on Clark. Reid is going to absorb power until somebody stops him.

We're keeping Sean Smith because he's ****ing talented. Would you rather we trade him for pennies and start Fleming or Cooper?

[Discuss Thrower]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

We're keeping Sean Smith because he's ****ing talented. Would you rather we trade him for pennies and start Fleming or Cooper?

A tradeable pick next year is worth more than a possible untradable compensation pick the year after.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

A tradeable pick next year is worth more than a possible untradable compensation pick the year after.

Not if it's anything lower than a 5th. And not if we have the chance to resign Smith to a decent deal.

[TEX]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

We're keeping Sean Smith because he's ****ing talented. Would you rather we trade him for pennies and start Fleming or Cooper?

You're correct about Smith and in assuming that's probably what Zilla would do.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

We're keeping Sean Smith because he's ****ing talented. Would you rather we trade him for pennies and start Fleming or Cooper?

I don't have a problem with Sean Smith. I like the guy. But if doesn't feel like the chiefs have interest in keeping him past this year. If they don't, then we should get value out of him instead of trying to salvage a few meaningless wins

[O.city]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I don't have a problem with Sean Smith. I like the guy. But if doesn't feel like the chiefs have interest in keeping him past this year. If they don't, then we should get value out of him instead of trying to salvage a few meaningless wins

Wins in the NFL are never meaningless.

I know that kind of flies in the face of everyone here, but as we've seen with coaching turnover, winning isn't easy.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by O.city

Wins in the NFL are never meaningless.

I know that kind of flies in the face of everyone here, but as we've seen with coaching turnover, winning isn't easy.

I am not suggesting we tank. But if we are holding on to tradeable assets we don't plan to keep In 2016 all so we can win 8 games instead of 6, that's part of the reason we never get anywhere.

[Discuss Thrower]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

I am not suggesting we tank. But if we are holding on to tradeable assets we don't plan to keep In 2016 all so we can win 8 games instead of 6, that's part of the reason we never get anywhere.

This this this this this.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Clarks comments this week don't sound promising. He's spinning this as if we are turning this ship around because we've won a few pretty meaningless games. And it sounds like we're keeping guys like Sean Smith around to make a desperate run even though we know Smith won't be back next year.

This is on Clark. Reid is going to absorb power until somebody stops him.

kcchiefs.com is littered with celebratory videos the past two weeks. They think the team is back on track and ready to go on a huge upswing.

Again, I'm fine with that type of thinking, but that would mean the team probably shouldn't have shit the bed against the goddamn Bears and Vikings. Because they did, instead of making a playoff push like they could be, they're going to be making a push for 8-8 and embarrassment.

And once again, no first round QB will be available.