Resurrect this thread in 3 years

[kccrow]

Originally Posted by vailpass

There are threads a plenty with him defending his new earther beliefs. In truth I respect him for standing by his convictions. I know it’s not cool to persecute someone for their faith but it’s just so factually ridiculous that sometimes it’s hard to resist.

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale

"Because one story makes me feel warm and fuzzy, and the other requires me to learn stuff I'm too busy to learn."

I don't think you or Ken Hamm are qualified to talk about what is 'contradictory' to science, but carry on.

I have absolutely no log in this fire, nor do I support one view or the other, but I'm curious what science the two of you support to refute his claim? I ask because I'm legitimately intrigued given that carbon-14 dating is only truly accurate for a few thousand years.