|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How many and which ones should they unretire? | |||
| #3 Jan Stenerud |
   
|
6 | 12.77% |
| #16 Len Dawson |
  
|
1 | 2.13% |
| #18 Emmitt Thomas |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| #28 Abner Haynes |
  
|
5 | 10.64% |
| #33 Stone Johnson |
  
|
27 | 57.45% |
| #36 Mack Lee Hill |
  
|
4 | 8.51% |
| #58 Derrick Thomas |
|
1 | 2.13% |
| #63 Willie Lanier |
|
0 | 0% |
| #78 Bobby Bell |
|
0 | 0% |
| #86 Buck Buchanon |
|
0 | 0% |
| #37 Joe Delaney * Not actually retired but team protected |
|
3 | 6.38% |
| Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
04-03-2021, 12:23 PM
|
#1 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City
Casino cash: $2797557
|
Numbers should be honored, but not retired.
1. You run out of numbers by retiring them. 2. I think it helps you remember the player by seeing the jersey number worn again. 3. We have the Ring of Honor with the number which helps us remember. 4. Hopefully there are many more years for the NFL and many more great players to come. Some new great player may want to wear #18 or #63, maybe even to proudly represent that past player. 5. Players that we want to remember, we always will, even though another player wears the number. I would have voted to unretire them all, but always pay them honor and that number is not just given out for for 3rd string probable camp cut. |
|
Posts: 3,932
  |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Which numbers should be unretired by the Chiefs
Hybrid Mode
