We wear the black hat now, fellas...

[notorious]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Yeah, it was an XP.

And my butthole absolutely puckered on that one. It was tiiiiiight.

But I think it was clearly good. And if it wasn't, Greg Olsen would've been sure to raise a stink about it...

I know the crew was an Fox crew, but they were so bad you could hear the buzzing from the NFC branded dildos shoved up their asses on live television.

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by notorious

I know the crew was an Fox crew, but they were so bad you could hear the buzzing from the NFC branded dildos shoved up their asses on live television.

It just frustrates me that the two 'controversies' the last 2 games have been manufactured by the broadcasters.

The roughing flag had people pissed "Because it was a late flag!!!!" and they're claming Mahomes sold it - IT WASN'T A LATE FLAG! Romo didn't see the back judge throw the flag that arced up over the camera view. If you watch it from the rear angle, that back judge throws a flag the absolute instant Mahomes is hit. But Romo missed it and didn't react until the 2nd flag came in, the flag that was seen on the broadcast, suddenly everyone just takes as gospel that the flag came in because Mahomes flopped.

And this week the broadcast crew just showed a bad angle of the hold and then misstated what it was that was called. The bad angle and clip came too late to show the infraction so Olsen focuses on the left hand and goes on and on about a 'soft hold'. Nevermind it was the right hand and it came before the clip y'all initially showed.

By the time they got the clip right, Olsen had dug in like a tick and despite Pereira trying to tell him it was a legit hold and even WHY, Olsen wouldn't budge because he had to double down. Suddenly Olsen had set the narrative.

It just pisses me off when the broadcasters do that.

Those were two controversies that came about 100% because of the broadcasting crew simply getting it wrong.

[JPH83]

[QUOTE.

Those were two controversies that came about 100% because of the broadcasting crew simply getting it wrong.[/QUOTE]

This.is the thing for me, and apologies if this has been covered elsewhere, I've not read all the way through. But it does feel like the media is where a lot of anti-Chiefs sentiment derives. I mean I get it, we win a lot, we're the new Pat's, everyone hates the team that keeps beating theirs. Except...i don't get it, because we're really not like the Pats. We have an incredibly well loved coach, they had a grumpy, monosyllabic prick. They had cheating controversies, we've been squeaky clean. And there is no way Brady is half as likeable as Mahomes. It doesn't make sense.

And then I watch the media, salty ex-players, professional s**r stirers and contrarians, and it's obvious the source. You gotta laugh but damn they are nauseating f***s

[crispystl]

Originally Posted by JPH83

[QUOTE.

Those were two controversies that came about 100% because of the broadcasting crew simply getting it wrong.

This.is the thing for me, and apologies if this has been covered elsewhere, I've not read all the way through. But it does feel like the media is where a lot of anti-Chiefs sentiment derives. I mean I get it, we win a lot, we're the new Pat's, everyone hates the team that keeps beating theirs. Except...i don't get it, because we're really not like the Pats. We have an incredibly well loved coach, they had a grumpy, monosyllabic prick. They had cheating controversies, we've been squeaky clean. And there is no way Brady is half as likeable as Mahomes. It doesn't make sense.

And then I watch the media, salty ex-players, professional s**r stirers and contrarians, and it's obvious the source. You gotta laugh but damn they are nauseating f***s[/QUOTE]

It's just really odd because they sucked off the Patriots and made every damn excuse for them in book for two decades.