|
|
![]() |
#1 |
No Keys, No Problem
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Denver
Casino cash: $1863136
|
I read most of it but it's doesn't sound like it's refuting the existence of a phenomenon. It sounds like it's saying how we classify it is wrong and we don't really understand it.
|
Posts: 32,832
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Cynical Misanthrope
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Alaska
Casino cash: $-1540000
|
Quote:
So she’s not disputing collapsing stars but she says the math shows the mass “lost” from the collapse is not because the collapsing star becomes so dense but rather that the mass is converted into radiation. This massive emission of radiation explains why astronomers can’t see anything - there’s nothing to see because it’s been converted to energy. But, I freely admit I’m no astro physicist. I could be mis-understanding her point. It is certainly far afield from what I normally study. What I find interesting is that even “settled” science isn’t so settled, so, I posted it here. Glad some are reading and responding to this. Thank you for an intelligent response. |
|
Posts: 4,334
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2021
Casino cash: $1620400
|
I have watched many documentaries about super massive black holes, quatum mechanics, string theory, time/space relations, and I can follow for about 10 minutes before my mind Blue Screens. I want to understand, but I guess my brain doesn't like very large and very small things. Oh well, the world needs ditch diggers too.
|
Posts: 1,173
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|