Details revealed on Chiefs’ Justyn Ross arrest, charges

[Realbaddog]

Found this to share:

Details revealed on Chiefs’ Justyn Ross arrest, charges

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — New details have been revealed in the case involving Kansas City Chiefs wide receiver Justyn Ross.

Shawnee police arrested Ross on Oct. 23, and the Johnson County district attorney criminally charged him on Oct. 24 with misdemeanor charges of domestic battery and criminal damage.

According to court documents, Ross found something on his girlfriend’s phone that “upset him.” After seeing her phone, he began yelling, got in her face and told her to get out of their apartment.

The court document also says Ross pushed his girlfriend and threw her to the floor. He then threw multiple things at her. According to police, the girlfriend had a scratch on her hand.

The girlfriend said that Ross broke multiple items, including a laptop, cellphone, jewelry and the key to her Mercedes.

She also said he scratched the side of her Mercedes with scissors. Officers confirmed that there were fresh scratches on her car.

Ross spoke with police and admitted to breaking the computer and claimed that he owned it. Court documents also say that Ross claims all the things he broke were things he owned.

According to court records, officers talked to witnesses who said they saw Justyn push a woman, and another witness said he saw Ross run a knife across the Mercedes.

Ross is currently on The NFL’s Commissioner Exempt List.

Ross is due back in court for a diversion hearing on Dec. 4.

Link:
https://www.ksn.com/sports/chiefs/de...topic%2Fsports

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by Marcellus

This is some seriously stupid shit. Yea Ross is an idiot but we really going to act like any of this deserves a felony charge?

This is a turd DA trying to nail a pelt to his wall. They cant even solve most murders in KC and let all kinds of bullshit go unchecked but this is a big issue eh?

What a piece of shit.

If he caused an amount of damage that falls into the felony category, it's a felony. It's in the definition of the law.

[KCJake]

Originally Posted by DaFace

If he caused an amount of damage that falls into the felony category, it's a felony. It's in the definition of the law.

Even though he damaged his own property?

[Eleazar]

Originally Posted by KCJake

Even though he damaged his own property?

It's pretty easy to prove who owns a car. The fact that his charges have been upgraded and only the car would seem to account for such a figure suggest he does not own the car.

[Abba-Dabba]

What a dumbass. I really don't care about the property damage. That is the least of the problem. The property damage just shows his mental immaturity. I am more concerned he felt the need to bring out a weapon during a domestic dispute where there is evidence of him being the aggressor.

The question has to be asked by his employer, considering the organizations past history. What if he turned that weapon on something else other than a possession. Chiefs would be wise to cut their losses on the investment and move on as quickly as they could.

[JohnnyHammersticks]

Originally Posted by srvy

Jesus, I have a good idea Ross's goose is cooked. But what's with the KMBZ Ch 9 reporter Andy Alcock? Is that Alfalfa all grown up? And the last name somehow I can't help laughing. Is that his porn name?

Nice hairpiece too. Looks like someone glued a beaver pelt to his head.

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by Radar Chief

Not his fault but I always thought the "Three " lost their burst when Shemp had to replace Curley.

Originally Posted by RealSNR

Shemp was still good in his own right.

It's when you got into the Joes and Curly Joes that shit went downhill

Shemp was okay. He was passable. But man, the Joe/Curly Joe performances are unwatchable.

As minor trivia, Larry married a woman who didn't like to do housework, so they lived in hotels for the first 20 years of their marriage.

[TLO]

1963chief... Please report to the thread dedicated to you on the front page

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by Eleazar

It's pretty easy to prove who owns a car. The fact that his charges have been upgraded and only the car would seem to account for such a figure suggest he does not own the car.

I wouldn't think that he has enough money to buy a Mercedes for a woman, but it's also possible that he paid for the car and her name is on it. If that's the case, then he needs to take a personal finance course for a number of different reasons.

[Chief Pagan]

Originally Posted by Marcellus

This is some seriously stupid shit. Yea Ross is an idiot but we really going to act like any of this deserves a felony charge?

This is a turd DA trying to nail a pelt to his wall. They cant even solve most murders in KC and let all kinds of bullshit go unchecked but this is a big issue eh?

What a piece of shit.

I don't usually dig into the details of these type stories, so maybe it is an out of control DA.

But bringing felony charges usually, though certainly not always, means there is some credible evidence.

And the NFL is certainly not operating on an innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt standard. And neither in general is any other private employer.

Not that I think the NFL is doing a good job with this stuff either. But when you try to market athletes as celebrity heroes, it doesn't look good when some go off script.

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by Abba-Dabba

What a dumbass. I really don't care about the property damage. That is the least of the problem. The property damage just shows his mental immaturity. I am more concerned he felt the need to bring out a weapon during a domestic dispute where there is evidence of him being the aggressor.

The question has to be asked by his employer, considering the organizations past history. What if he turned that weapon on something else other than a possession. Chiefs would be wise to cut their losses on the investment and move on as quickly as they could.

What weapon did he threaten her with?

[Skyy God]

Them hoes ain’t loyal….

[KCJake]

Originally Posted by Skyy God

Them hoes ain’t loyal….

This.

[Abba-Dabba]

Originally Posted by Marcellus

What weapon did he threaten her with?

Maybe you need to read again what I wrote. I never said he threatened her with a weapon. I am posing a liability question that his employer should... probably is asking.

His employer doesn't need for him to turn a weapon on a human being before posing that question for their own protection from his actions in this incident, or potentially future incidents. They have been sued in the past for wrongful death from the actions of a player. I'm quite sure that is not something they want to have to go through again.

[ShortRoundChief]

Originally Posted by Marcellus

What weapon did he threaten her with?

His hands. They're made of stone.

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by Abba-Dabba

Maybe you need to read again what I wrote. I never said he threatened her with a weapon. I am posing a liability question that his employer should... probably is asking.

His employer doesn't need for him to turn a weapon on a human being before posing that question for their own protection from his actions in this incident, or potentially future incidents. They have been sued in the past for wrongful death from the actions of a player. I'm quite sure that is not something they want to have to go through again.

What weapon are you referring to?