What is a catch? Inbounds or out of bounds?

[kcgreene]

I liked the ruling because I started Garrett Wilson in Fantasy, so obviously the refs were correct.

If I was playing him, I'd have opposed the ruling and the refs would have been cheating bastards.

It's the simple things sometimes...

[smithandrew051]

Originally Posted by kcgreene

I liked the ruling because I started Garrett Wilson in Fantasy, so obviously the refs were correct.

If I was playing him, I'd have opposed the ruling and the refs would have been cheating bastards.

It's the simple things sometimes...

I like it because it was good for the Chiefs.

Would not support if it was bad for the Chiefs.

[ThaVirus]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

I hope not. That's gonna be one of those rule changes that create more headaches than it solves.

I mean, what if a 'toe drag' ends up a 'toe skip' and you double tap the same foot twice. Is that 'two steps' because the toe bounced off the ground before it re-connected? Now do we have to start seeing how high the foot lifted to determine if it 'broke contact with the grass' before it came down again, thus constituting the same foot twice?

That's gonna be a shitshow. Please don't get into all that.

As you've noted - at a point this is all theatre either way. Why should it be 2 rather than 1 as in college? No reason - it's arbitrary. So it's not like we're leaning on any fundamental laws of nature here.

If the rule says get two feet down rather than 1 foot down twice, well that's the damn rule. Execute that.

Good point. Yeah, **** reviewing that then.