Should the Chiefs have signed Saquon?

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

Pretty sure every team in the NFL should have

Yeah - this is pretty much the answer.

That said, it's just so damn rare that big money RBs work out, especially when they change teams. And Saquon didn't look nearly as explosive his last couple of years in NY.

Now he just looks healthy and as strong as he's looked since he was a rookie. His legs are back and that's not something you can really expect to happen for most 'backs.

Any team in the league would've been better by signing the guy. He's the best RB out there - he's playing with the speed/explosion of McCaffrey and power of Henry. Yeah - hindsight says EVERYONE should've signed him.

But it is what it is.