Beisel signs with Patriots

Kyle401 · 04-08-2005, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shakesthecat

Eh, no great loss.

He played hard, but that's about all I can say for the guy.

Well like him or not, he did lead the Chiefs in tackles before getting injured. He has a blue collar work ethic that most of the rest of our defense is lacking, plus he is a FOOTBALL PLAYER, not just an athlete collecting a paycheck. I would have rather have him back for depth and to push the starters.

Bootlegged · 04-08-2005, 08:18 AM

Good for him, good for us.

HC_Chief · 04-08-2005, 08:18 AM

I would rather they took Mitchell... at least Beisel can play ST.

shaneo69 · 04-08-2005, 08:22 AM

Beisel will be good in their 3-4, probably become as productive as Vrabel and Phifer. The Chiefs never are able to figure out how utilize the tweeners that they draft.

htismaqe · 04-08-2005, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyle401

Well like him or not, he did lead the Chiefs in tackles before getting injured. He has a blue collar work ethic that most of the rest of our defense is lacking, plus he is a FOOTBALL PLAYER, not just an athlete collecting a paycheck. I would have rather have him back for depth and to push the starters.

Kawika Mitchell lead the team in tackles too. So did Mazlowski before that.

Better than bad does not equal good.

Kyle401 · 04-08-2005, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rufusmaqe

Kawika Mitchell lead the team in tackles too. So did Mazlowski before that.

Better than bad does not equal good.

True, but some of these "good" players need a Biesel or Maz to push them to be their best. Those guys go all out every play. With that kind of player on the roster, the starters can't take plays off or loaf in practice or they will be replaced. Biesel had value to this football team as a special teamer and a hardworking backup. I'm not saying he's not replaceable or that he should have been the starter, but I think he would have made Fooj, Fox, and Mitchell work harder to improve. After all, would you want to be lower on the depth chart than Biesel?

C-Mac · 04-08-2005, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyle401

Well like him or not, he did lead the Chiefs in tackles before getting injured. He has a blue collar work ethic that most of the rest of our defense is lacking, plus he is a FOOTBALL PLAYER, not just an athlete collecting a paycheck. I would have rather have him back for depth and to push the starters.

04-08-2005, 08:18 AM	#2
Bootlegged One4Mahomes Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: f Casino cash: $9955545	Good for him, good for us.
Posts: 5,234

04-08-2005, 08:18 AM	#3
HC_Chief That's just f***in' stupid Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: suburbia Casino cash: $3687107	I would rather they took Mitchell... at least Beisel can play ST. __________________ "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
Posts: 12,355

04-08-2005, 08:22 AM	#4
shaneo69 Smug Weasel Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Bleachers at Busch Casino cash: $10004900	Beisel will be good in their 3-4, probably become as productive as Vrabel and Phifer. The Chiefs never are able to figure out how utilize the tweeners that they draft. __________________ "I like Chiefs president Carl Peterson. I respect his business savvy. I envy his management skills and his penchant never to be driven by the whims of popularity. I admire his willingness to take responsibility for decisions that don’t work out the way he would have wanted." - Rufus, from KCChiefs.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 4,910

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode