****The OFFICIAL Giants vs. Tony Romos! thread****

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by BWillie007

And how??? The surrounding level of talent is better, but not really at QB. The Giants don't really have a hand. Eli is #1 round talent, they have no choice to stick with him. It's a financial decision more than anything.

For all you can say about Manning if you'd rather have Brodie Croyle than him, there aren't words for that.

[BWillie]

Originally Posted by Mecca

For all you can say about Manning if you'd rather have Brodie Croyle than him, there aren't words for that.

If you look at results ON THE FIELD, and not the fact that he's a Manning offspring or a #1 pick...I really think a swap of him and Croyle would be a complete toss up, if not in the Chiefs favor not to do so.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by BWillie007

If you look at results ON THE FIELD, and not the fact that he's a Manning offspring or a #1 pick...I really think a swap of him and Croyle would be a complete toss up, if not in the Chiefs favor not to do so.

When Croyle makes the playoffs or wins a playoff game let me know.

[Coach]

Originally Posted by Mecca

When Croyle makes the playoffs or wins a playoff game let me know.

Again, Croyle can't do everything by himself, just to let you know.

[BWillie]

Originally Posted by Mecca

When Croyle makes the playoffs or wins a playoff game let me know.

Trent Dilfer won a freaking superbowl. It is a TEAM game you must forget.

[Coach]

Originally Posted by Mecca

For all you can say about Manning if you'd rather have Brodie Croyle than him, there aren't words for that.

I'll take Brodie over Eli as of this point. Eli's prone to INT's, especially in his 4th year in the league.

Eli exactly haven't shown me that he's worthy of being number one. The Chargers made a excellent decision to trade him to the Giants for more picks.

Eli's overrated, always have been, always will.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Mecca

For all you can say about Manning if you'd rather have Brodie Croyle than him, there aren't words for that.

Hate to point this out to you, but Manning is older, and cost them two first round picks and a third rounder.

Croyle cost one third rounder.

Yeah, I'd rather have Croyle. He cost a hell of a lot less, both monetarily and in draft picks. It's not just about comparing the two physically.

Do you think that the Pats would choose a 29 year old CB who is just a tick better than a 24 year old, when the 29 year old will also command a much larger salary?