You say luck, I say FU.

[Gonzo]

Going over the win yesterday and for the first time in nearly 11 months I can honestly say that that was a dominant performance by the Chiefs in almost every aspect.

However,
I have been listening to the following crap from every Donk fan I know and some that I don't:

"The only reason we lost that game was due to the turnovers, all of which were just luck."

F*** YOU!

LUCK??? REALLY DOUCHEBAGS???


Tell you what, review the game tape. I saw a dominant performance by our D. The only dark spot was the td reception by Marshall and that was inches from being tipped away. Listen here Donk fans, take your lumps bitches. The only reason you have a winning record was because of "luck".

In all honesty, the reason we had so many turnovers was because our backfield played with such physicality that your recievers were in awe. They would not complete their routes knowing that if they caught the ball they would be decapitated by our land sharks running at 45 mph wanting to taste blood.

I really don't think any of those turnovers were "luck". Our defense has been trained to strip the ball. Our d-backs were always in the right position and did not give up the big play. We put pressure on Cutler and forced him into some bad throws.
That is how you win a game.

Hagens is available. He can bootleg.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

It was good, but dominant? No way. With 4 turnovers we were still in position to win the game. I give all the credit in the world to KC for an intense game, but I wouldn't use the word dominant.

When were you in position to win?? IIRC WE were up 7 and RAN the ball down YOUR throats ton seal a W. the T.O.'S werent LUCK they were what happens when players are put in a position to succeed

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

That call wasn't going to get reversed. Possesion was never established by the offense and Champ got the interception and was down by contact. The fumble was a bad blown whistle, but SD still had a change to stop the TD and the 2 point conversion. There was nothing lucky about going on 4th getting six and then getting 2 with the exact same play. In the Saints game our guy was not offsides. His foot might have been in the neutral zone, but had he been the ref would have called it. It just looks that way from the camera angle using an unofficial line/

[tmax63]

Garcia, the ref's gift makes the Donko's 2-2. You call pass interference when the ex-Donko O'Neal does an arm bar on Bowe in the NE game and the Chiefs could well be 2-2 as well. If the queen had balls she'd be king. The Donkos aren't a very good 3-1 team and I think the Chiefs are a good 1-3 team. There isn't as much difference between the 2 teams as many of the talking heads think IMHO.

[Frazod]

We could be 2-2.
Denver SHOULD BE 2-2.

[Hammock Parties]

Vulture, any more skanks? I want to see your nightlife escapades.

[prhom]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

That call wasn't going to get reversed. Possesion was never established by the offense and Champ got the interception and was down by contact. The fumble was a bad blown whistle, but SD still had a change to stop the TD and the 2 point conversion. There was nothing lucky about going on 4th getting six and then getting 2 with the exact same play. In the Saints game our guy was not offsides. His foot might have been in the neutral zone, but had he been the ref would have called it. It just looks that way from the camera angle using an unofficial line/

I don't know man, even here in Denver a lot of people think the Broncos have been lucky. You can argue that the Broncos would have been good enough to still win even if those things had gone the other way, but you can't sit here and tell me that Champ intercepted that ball against SD. That being said, I'd still rather be lucky than good I guess.

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

It was good, but dominant? No way. With 4 turnovers we were still in position to win the game. I give all the credit in the world to KC for an intense game, but I wouldn't use the word dominant.

This is correct. Had we not played conservative football in the red zone 2x in the first quarter against a team with a bad pass defense we could have opened the can of whoopass.

I will take the convincing win though.