|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
Quote:
Giants won one without a star TE, and look better this year. You don't trade away the future for a 3 year player, especially a TE.
__________________
![]() |
|
Posts: 70,769
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
The Giants have the extra draft choices to do it, so it certainly won't hurt them. Especially if Gonzalez helps them win at least one more Super Bowl (which would seem to be a certainty if he's traded).
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2051115
|
Quote:
Like Milkman said, the Giants won last year with Kevin Boss at TE. They don't NEED Gonzalez to win a SB. |
|
Posts: 60,758
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
The Giants would be crazy to give up more than a third for Tony, but if they offered that 2nd and fifthas has been suggested by Glazer, I'd be all over that like a pig on shit.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 70,769
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
If the Saints gave up a 2nd & a 5th for an injured Jeremy Shockey (who's nowhere near as talented at Gonzalez), why would they be "crazy"? I don't get that logic at all. |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2051115
|
Quote:
At least the Saints NEEDED a TE. |
|
Posts: 60,758
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
Additionally, the Giants are pretty much loaded at nearly every position. They're not the Chiefs. As a matter of fact, they're the exact opposite of the Chiefs. If they give up the 2nd & 5th acquired from N.O. for Shockey, they've upgraded their roster tremendously with the acquisition of Gonzalez. AND they still have all 7 draft picks in 2009. IMO, it's a no-brainer for the Giants |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2051115
|
Quote:
They gave up WAY too much, and they did for two reasons: One, they desperately needed a pass-catching TE, and overpaid for one. Two, even with his injury history, Shockey is what, 27? He has 7-8 years left in the tank. Gonzalez MIGHT have two. |
|
Posts: 60,758
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
Quote:
Didn't they just win a SB without Gonzalez?
__________________
![]() |
|
Posts: 70,769
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
Quote:
And really, did they need a TE that badly? They were putting up a ton of points without a top TE.
__________________
![]() |
|
Posts: 70,769
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2051115
|
|
Posts: 60,758
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|