Debating Herm's Future

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

No you cant blame just one party, that I agree with... It took BOTH Herm and Carl to create this mess... Therefore, BOTH should be removed... Carl for some decisions and Herm for not being able to develop those players and for not forcing Carl to address the OL... Turley and Welborne for example...

And that's fine. Not to mention committing to Brodie Croyle.

I'm fine with all that (even though people say I'm a Herm homer, for some reason).

But there are plenty (not you) that will pretend that 100% of the problems in KC are due to Herm Edwards. I think there's strong evidence to suggest that with the team Carl handed over in 2006, with reports that he was the one holding back the rebuild, it's most likely that he's about 75% responsible and Herm 25% responsible.

That's still 25% too much. But it at least takes away the notion that Herm is responsible for everything wrong in KC right now.

[Reerun_KC]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

That's still 25% too much. But it at least takes away the notion that Herm is responsible for everything wrong in KC right now.

No but when your fan base thinks it was one of the worse possible good ol boy hires and when he comes in and bashes what was left of our prized offense, it pissed people off...

His bold brash style of running his man pleaser about the circus offense and he was going to fix the defense, because he knew he could? Well that didnt set well with some...

I for one have been a Herm basher since the day he was hired. I never liked his style in NYJ and he has been atrocious here on gamedays...

I will be thrilled when he is gone and the last of Carl's regein of Terror is over...