What Clark has created by NOT firing Herm immediately...

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

All of your reasons are BS.

If you give any coach that many draft picks, he's going to pluck a lot of young talent.

Why didn't Herm turn it over to Chan from day 1? Good coaches realize how inept they are in one area and allow other people to coach the area they are weak in- like Cameron in Baltimore and Mularkey in Atlanta.

Any coach was coming in here and seeing the age of the roster. You think this makes him a good coach? It means he's not blind. Anyone can start a youth movement. Getting 2 wins out of that youth movement shows me how awful he is. Rod Marinelli won 0 games with a young team, and he took FULL responsibility for the failure. Herm Edwards wins 2 games and he says the entire staff is back and he grades himself a C.

This "motiviated" team was still 2-14. When you have a ton of young players, they are going to play hard every week regardless of who the coach is because they are always playing for that second contract. I don't attribute this to Herm at all.

Herm's shoddy record helped get rid of Carl. I guess I can thank him for sucking so bad that Carl had to go.

Herm Edwards is a glorified defensive backs coach. He's not a good head coach by any stretch of the imagination no matter how much you have to stretch to find reasons.

Good coaches find ways to win more than 2 games out of 25.

Oh, ok - you convienced me.
Hey you asked for reasons why I think what I think, you got an answer. If you don't like it, oh well. I guess I just see the team/games/players/coaches differently than you do. Can we all drop this stupid arguement now? It's like a twighlight episode, lost in time, stuck in space, saying the same things over and over and over and over.....

Oh and if Herm goes (again with this disclaimer too, before I get fireballed) I am not going to be butt hurt.