Bracketology Thread

[doomy3]

Originally Posted by WoodDraw

I don't "value" anything more. Everything factors in.

Well, you said their resumes were similar. If they are similar, and one finished first in conference and one finished third, and the third place team wins the conference tournament, then you say MU is more deserving, isn't that valuing the tournament more then the regular season championship?

[WoodDraw]

Originally Posted by doomy3

Well, you said their resumes were similar. If they are similar, and one finished first in conference and one finished third, and the third place team wins the conference tournament, then you say MU is more deserving, isn't that valuing the tournament more then the regular season championship?

The season doesn't end with the regular season. I said their resumes were similar, taking into account all games played all season, including the nonconf, conference, and tournament play. I think you can make an argument for any of the three teams deserving a #2 seed, as we've seen here.

[Stewie]

Originally Posted by WoodDraw

The season doesn't end with the regular season.

The problem is that some league's seasons do end after the regular season.

[WoodDraw]

Originally Posted by Stewie

The problem is that some league's seasons do end after the regular season.

Hah, I'm not sure how that's a problem?

Some may, but ours doesn't. You don't ignore the games just because others play differently.