Scout.com's Mock Draft - 04-03-2009

[AustinChief]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Glenn Dorsey isn't any less talented than he was last year. It's not his fault that we had a stupid coaching staff playing him out of position.

I hope you are right... but so far I think MOST people would agree that he hasn't shown us anything worth the #5 pick...

But let's remove Dorsey from the equation. If you had the option of Long, Albert, or Clady at 5, knowing what you know now, only a moron would take Jake Long.

No I would still take Long if I HAD to take one of the three (hint: so would ANY currently employed NFL GM), but otherwise KNOWING what I know now, I would trade down and take Albert.

Good LT's don't need running backs and tight ends to help them out. Jake Long will never be more than a slightly above average LT who gets pwned by speed rushers.

I love how you make this stuff up...

#1 every LT gets help on occasion... LONG didn't get an inordinate amount.. and the BURDEN OF PROOF for your inane statement rests on you... show me a factual account of all his plays and compare him against other LTs and how much help was given as a percentage based on type of play (run or pass) Otherwise, it seems you are making this up to support a previously failed argument.

#2 How many MORE ProBowls does Long need to go to before you admit being wrong?

#3 How is it that you and Mecca know so much more than the rest of the people WORKING in the NFL right now? Bill Parcells seems to think he is a worthy LT, so would damn near any GM asked about him.