I'm going to post this analysis for fun, cause draft talk is all that matters

[L.A. Chieffan]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

You are speaking to a commanding officer of Germ Warfare, son. He was a dumb sonofabitch who deserved to have his corpse burned outside his bunker in Arrowhead, but he is not responsible for ruining our value at this draft pick.

we gots cassel hamas. we dont ****ing need value, cassels dick is in the cobra kai hall of fame

[RealSNR]

"At least we don't have to take a risk with Matt Cassel. We're getting a proven commodity."


Remember that line? How did that go? All we did was STILL take a risk on an unproven guy (Cassel is unproven, yes. One season does not a QB make) AND further our risk at #3 overall by not drafting a QB.

[SenselessChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by SNR

"At least we don't have to take a risk with Matt Cassel. We're getting a proven commodity."


Remember that line? How did that go? All we did was STILL take a risk on an unproven guy (Cassel is unproven, yes. One season does not a QB make) AND further our risk at #3 overall by not drafting a QB.

I don't think that Cassel is unproven. But, I think he is more proven that Sanchez or Stafford. It isn't just about on the field, it is about everything that goes into being a QB. Pioli knows that Cassel is a hard worker.

Don't you think it is a bit ironic that his former offensive coordinator and GM both get into a bidding war for the guy because they want him to be the QB of their team. Yet, Sanchez's coach talks about how Sanchez isn't ready.

I know, I Know, Pete Carroll is just SO competetive that he is willing to submarine his own player's draft prospects even though he has never done anything like that before. I guess Sanchez is the first player he has ever had come out early.

It is ridiculous to assert that the #3 pick is any "more" risky for the Chiefs. QB's are risky like any other position.