|
|
View Poll Results: Which type of team would you prefer? | |||
Constant contender, but never seems to be able to make waves in the postseason. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 21.95% |
Below-average team most years, but makes a legitimate Super Bowl run about once a decade. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 51.22% |
Some other type of team that I will describe below (aka the weasel option) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 26.83% |
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#28 |
Man of Culture
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Far Beyond Comprehension
Casino cash: $-3097187
|
I want an organization that knows how to build a team yes there are peaks and valleys, but the down years should be non-existent with a good FO, due to the transition phase is more of reloading when the talent is already present. When a player's contract comes up then their's an equally good player to fill the position. The continuity should be seamless concerning this issue.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 43,464
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|