Sanchez?

[DaWolf]

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

When you don't take chances and go for the Big Play, what else could be the possible outcome?

Seriously?

Uhh, taking chances and going for big plays would only lead to a sack for this offense. Actually getting big plays down the field requires pass catchers who can get separation downfield and linemen who can hold blocks for more than 1 second...

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by DaWolf

Uhh, taking chances and going for big plays would only lead to a sack for this offense. Actually getting big plays down the field requires pass catchers who can get separation downfield and linemen who can hold blocks for more than 1 second...

Uh, there's plenty of sacking going on as-is. Meh.

[SenselessChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

Uh, there's plenty of sacking going on as-is. Meh.

Yeah, he should be winging it around like your hero Sanchez.... that worked wonders for the Jets.

Better team by miles and still lost, despite 200 yards rushing.

Brilliant.

Oh, and the 'weather' was bad..... Sanchez complained before the game that he had never played in temps below 50 degrees....ouch, my vagina's frozen over....thats who I want leading my team, the guy griping about 44 degree weather..... I guess someone forgot to tell him NY doesn't have a dome.... what is he going to do when he has to play in negative degree weather with snow and wind?

Too bad he wasn't drafted by KC, I mean it never gets cold here.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Yeah, he should be winging it around like your hero Sanchez.... that worked wonders for the Jets.

Better team by miles and still lost, despite 200 yards rushing.

Brilliant.

Oh, and the 'weather' was bad..... Sanchez complained before the game that he had never played in temps below 50 degrees....ouch, my vagina's frozen over....thats who I want leading my team, the guy griping about 44 degree weather..... I guess someone forgot to tell him NY doesn't have a dome.... what is he going to do when he has to play in negative degree weather with snow and wind?

Too bad he wasn't drafted by KC, I mean it never gets cold here.

Who's the tool now, tool?

Get bent over your excuse-making for Mark Castle; by the time he and Sanchez are on the "same level", it'll be time for Mark Castle to retire. And isn't that swell?
Sanchez is a true rook on a winning team with a rook Head Coach; I'm sure he weeps nightly for your approval.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

Get bent over your excuse-making for Mark Castle; by the time he and Sanchez are on the "same level", it'll be time for Mark Castle to retire. And isn't that swell?

Uh, yeah, because Cassel is practically over the hill.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by Brock

Uh, yeah, because Cassel is practically over the hill.

Ah yes, I forgot; this is the same crowd that thinks Warner and Favre's longevity are the norm in the NFL.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

Ah yes, I forgot; this is the same crowd that thinks Warner and Favre's longevity are the norm in the NFL.

Even if Cassel only plays until he's 34, that's 7 freaking years from now. Come up with a worthy argument for a change. I like Sanchez, but your douchiness is almost making me hope he turns out to be a piece of shit.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

Who's the tool now, tool?

Get bent over your excuse-making for Mark Castle; by the time he and Sanchez are on the "same level", it'll be time for Mark Castle to retire. And isn't that swell?
Sanchez is a true rook on a winning team with a rook Head Coach; I'm sure he weeps nightly for your approval.

wow now 3_3 is a winning team?
Posted via Mobile Device

[SenselessChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

Who's the tool now, tool?

Get bent over your excuse-making for Mark Castle; by the time he and Sanchez are on the "same level", it'll be time for Mark Castle to retire. And isn't that swell?
Sanchez is a true rook on a winning team with a rook Head Coach; I'm sure he weeps nightly for your approval.

You didn't bend anyone over on here. No excuse making either.... it is called observation and knowing a little about the game.

For the record, Sanchez will get better. Sanchez will be a decent QB, and Sanchez and Cassel will most likely be pretty much the same in their prime. Both good, not great.

They both have similar talent.

You better hope that Sanchez gets to Cassel's level sooner than when Cassel is going to retire.... because Cassel has another eight years at least in the league.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

Who's the tool now, tool?

Get bent over your excuse-making for Mark Castle; by the time he and Sanchez are on the "same level", it'll be time for Mark Castle to retire. And isn't that swell?
Sanchez is a true rook on a winning team with a rook Head Coach; I'm sure he weeps nightly for your approval.

Sanchez and Cassel have been playing at the same level. If you can't see that in the last 3 games, then you are blinded by Sanchez homerism. Both QBs are playing average. One of them makes big plays and a ton of mistakes. One of them makes few mistakes but limited big plays.

The only thing separating the two teams is a supporting cast. How quickly you forget that the Jets were 9-7 last year, while the Chiefs were 2-14.

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

Uh, there's plenty of sacking going on as-is. Meh.

So the QB should try holding the ball even longer to throw deep passes to covered receivers? People here are already bitching because Cassel dares to hold the ball for longer than 0.3 seconds.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

So the QB should try holding the ball even longer to throw deep passes to covered receivers? People here are already bitching because Cassel dares to hold the ball for longer than 0.3 seconds.

When he has 4 to 6 seconds in the pocket after evading the rush, making an attempt would be quite the welcome change, yes.

See the Dallas game. Evade the rush, and then "uh...uh...looking...uh...(throw it away).
Take a chance for ****'s sake.

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

When he has 4 to 6 seconds in the pocket after evading the rush, making an attempt would be quite the welcome change, yes.

See the Dallas game. Evade the rush, and then "uh...uh...looking...uh...(throw it away).
Take a chance for ****'s sake.

So you want him to take the stupidest possible approach with a defense that has been giving up yards as if they are candy on Halloween.

Brilliant.