Why people are disappointed: Exhibit A - Talent Evaluation

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

On that list, most of those guys didn't have much positional value, and of those who have, only Harvin has played well enough to suggest that he's a "foundational" player.

And Jackson had positional value?

You're missing the point - if we were going to ignore positional value, why not get a ****ing playmaker?

I'm sorry, but your delusional if you think those players aren't "core" or "foundational" players.