|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-04-2010, 11:15 AM
|
#28 | |
|
Like I woke up in Wonderland..
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: KCMO
Casino cash: $806558
|
I'm not sure why its necessary to have a "thunder". Is it really that much better to have one big and one small RB, as opposed to 2 smaller RBs?
"Big" backs might have an advantage at the goal-line, but nothing that can't be given to the FB, or hell give it to a TE if power is all thats necesary. No need to waste the roster spot for a goal-line specialist RB. We had one "thunder" already, and he got cut with his 2.7 yard average.
__________________
    Quote:
|
|
|
Posts: 18,764
  |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode