Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can
how do you look at the Chiefs and decide that LT is even in the top 10 of positions needing to be upgraded, much less #1?
|
Other than the 13 penalties, 7 sacks, and double digit quarterback hits and pressures? And being ineffective in run blocking?
I guess he did okay if you take those things out of consideration.
No need for a better offensive line. We should focus on defense. I mean, we didn't just pick back to back defensive line players with our first pick in the draft the past two years or anything silly like that. Sure, we'll have to give those Herm/Carl first rounders another couple of years before we need to really think about replacing them because everyone knows that Herm/Carl could really scout the talent - but talent that needs about five years or so to mature. To focus on building a decent offense (especially an offensive line) would be reeruned. Everyone knows that you can get All-Pro level players on the O-line later in the sixth round and beyond. Especially when our quarterback is a guy who costs us the Sanchize and we'd rather see him killed this next year guaranteeing us a possible chance at Jake Locker next year in the draft. (We'd really like Blaine Gabbert, but he played at Missouri and since they are a Big 12 spread team, that means that he's going to be epic fail in the NFL, so **** him.) Once Locker is in place, then we will authorize the selection of decent offensive linemen because we don't want our QBOTF who was OUR draft pick to get needlessly injured. But no offensive linemen in the draft until our QBOTF that isn't a Big 12 product is drafted by a front office approved by Jason Whitlock and a majority of certified/initiated CP Drafturbators. We need to get that safety or MLB NOW!!! Playmakers at defensive support positions win champioinships!!! Ask Brian Urlacher or Deron Cherry. They'll tell you that's the truth.
02-03-2010, 04:23 PM
Threaded Mode