**Missouri Valley Conference Title Game Thread**

[ChiefaRoo]

Originally Posted by Coach

Yeah, I think its over now.
Posted via Mobile Device

WSU can shoot the three so they can catch up but it's getting ugly.

[Coach]

Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo

WSU can shoot the three so they can catch up but it's getting ugly.

The problem is that Stuntz is getting owned by a stronger UNI post player, that number 14 for WSU chucking 3 pointers that he can't hit a side of a barn, and 16 some team turnovers.
Posted via Mobile Device

[ChiefaRoo]

Originally Posted by Coach

The problem is that Stuntz is getting owned by a stronger UNI post player, that number 14 for WSU chucking 3 pointers that he can't hit a side of a barn, and 16 some team turnovers.
Posted via Mobile Device

True, however, Stutz is only a Soph. and he's going to be a very good player for WSU. The bigs for Northern Iowa are all upperclassmen and the one guy outweighs him by 40lbs.

UNI plays excellent team defense as well.

[Coach]

Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo

True, however, Stutz is only a Soph. and he's going to be a very good player for WSU. The bigs for Northern Iowa are all upperclassmen and the one guy outweighs him by 40lbs.

UNI plays excellent team defense as well.

The bottom part is very true, as evidenced by the 23-3 run bu UNI.

I think WSU should be in the NCAA tournament.
Posted via Mobile Device

[ChiefaRoo]

Originally Posted by Coach

The bottom part is very true, as evidenced by the 23-3 run bu UNI.

I think WSU should be in the NCAA tournament.
Posted via Mobile Device

Me too, 13 seed?

[Coach]

Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo

Me too, 13 seed?

13 to 15 seems doable. They have a nice RPI and they're what, 10-6 against top 50 in the RPI?
Posted via Mobile Device

[kstater]

Originally Posted by Coach

13 to 15 seems doable. They have a nice RPI and they're what, 10-6 against top 50 in the RPI?
Posted via Mobile Device

Try 1-3 vs Top 50

RPI 43 SOS 117

NIT bound.