*****OFFICIAL 2013 Kansas City Chiefs Training Camp Thread*****

[shitgoose]

Training Camp Schedule

http://www.missouriwestern.edu/kcchiefs/

Rookies & QBs report July 22nd

Rest of Team reports July 25th

Spoiler!

Friday, July 26 - Practice – 3:30 p.m. – $5 Admission Fee

First Practice Open to the Public – Entire Team Autograph Session

Saturday, July 27 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Sunday, July 28 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Monday, July 29 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Tuesday, July 30 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Wednesday, July 31 - No Practice

Thursday, Aug. 1 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Friday, Aug. 2 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Saturday, Aug. 3 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

“American Family” Fun Day – Entire Team Autograph Session

Sunday, Aug. 4 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Monday, Aug. 5 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Tuesday, Aug. 6 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Wednesday, Aug. 7 - No Practice

Thursday, Aug. 8 - Team Travel Day – No Practice

Friday, Aug. 9 - Preseason Game No. 1 – Chiefs at Saints – 7 p.m.

Saturday, Aug. 10 - No Practice

Sunday, Aug. 11 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Monday, Aug. 12 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Tuesday, Aug. 13 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Wednesday, Aug. 14 - Practice – 8:15 a.m.

Thursday, Aug. 15 - Team Travel Day – No Practice – Camp in St. Joseph Breaks

Friday, Aug. 16 - Preseason Game No. 2 – Chiefs vs. 49ers – 7 p.m.

* Weather and field conditions are evaluated daily. All dates and times provided are subject to change.

Tweets from @ChiefsTC/chiefs

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by J Diddy

Not particularly. I think he's overrated but he's nowhere near as bad as some people make him out to be because they wanted someone else with the pick.

I also think it's safe to say that I'm not a big fan of your statistical cherry picking.

How do you cherry pick a ****ing number?

[Mr. Laz]

Originally Posted by Coogs

#3:
Nick Jacobs ‏@Jacobs71 now

Bray with the deep ball. Poor decision because Greg Castillo had inside position. Copper breaks up the almost INT

I hate this

if the pass is incomplete then it's a poor decision

if the pass is complete then it's a QB trusting his receiver and letting the WR make a play.




our receivers suck

[ShortRoundChief]

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate

How do you cherry pick a ****ing number?

I dunno Lil Queefy.

How are 3 apples compared to 3 oranges.

They're both numbers, amirite?

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by J Diddy

I dunno Lil Queefy.

How are 3 apples compared to 3 oranges.

They're both numbers, amirite?

Clay's stats are the greatest ever posted on this forum. Deal with it.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate

Then I guess they don't like SNR....or was it you?

You are attached to it though.

[ShortRoundChief]

Originally Posted by Lil Queefy

Clay's stats are the greatest ever posted on this forum. Deal with it.

Wut?

I had a vision of the girl saying "Leave Brittany alone" screaming that.

He picks through stats at Pro Football Reference with a confirmation bias. He illuminates the ones that, in his mind, prove his point and completely disregards any outside factors, outliers or confounders.

Anyway, good talking to you I've got shit I've got to do.

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Which just further proves that you're completely ****ing clueless

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...-detroit-lions

When news broke Tuesday of Matthew Stafford's reported three-year contract extension, the Around The League crew immediately wondered if the Detroit Lions overpaid for a quarterback who owns a career 1-23 record versus teams with a winning percentage over .500.

Clutch.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

He did have that sweet TD against the Browns..

[saphojunkie]

Originally Posted by petegz28

All the reports during camp last year was how much better Romeo ran the camp, etc, etc

I heard Matt Williamson say last year that Romeo's camps were awful. He was at Browns camp with him and said he looked around thinking, "This is really not going to work." From there on, the 810 guys were all dubious about Romeo and their camp reports reflected it.

[saphojunkie]

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate

How do you cherry pick a ****ing number?

Read his sig. It's cherry picking. When an opponent scores more than 24 points, Alex Loses! AMIRITE?

Well, actually, that statistic means nothing if Alex Smith's team ALSO scored more than 24 points. If his team loses 48-45, then it would fall under Clay's "Statistical analysis" (see: bullshit), because Smith's team technically lost while the opponent scored over 24 points. But so did his team. So, if the defense had held the opponent to 24 points, he would have won, and Clay's point would be meaningless. Granted, this isn't true for all of these losses or even a majority, but even one contrary example shows the fallacy in relying on statistical propaganda, which is what the sig is.

Still, it's an arbitrary benchmark. He's using statistics to prove points he already believes. That's cherry picking. He would have you believe that the only thing you have to do is to beat Smith is score 24 points, because clearly he was incapable of leading his team to more than four scores in a game. Ever.

They make for great discussion, but it's annoying as **** to have to go and do the research just to disprove a bullshit theory that shouldn't have existed in the first place.

edit: I ****ing love the gifs though. They are far superior to statistics for making an argument.

[aturnis]

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz

I hate this

if the pass is incomplete then it's a poor decision

if the pass is complete then it's a QB trusting his receiver and letting the WR make a play.




our receivers suck

It was a poor decision because he wasn't open. That it's all.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by J Diddy

Wut?

I had a vision of the girl saying "Leave Brittany alone" screaming that.

He picks through stats at Pro Football Reference with a confirmation bias. He illuminates the ones that, in his mind, prove his point and completely disregards any outside factors, outliers or confounders.

Anyway, good talking to you I've got shit I've got to do.

Yep, them ditches ain't gonna' dig themselves.

Originally Posted by PGM

You are attached to it though.

I AM the man, what can I say?

[The Bad Guy]

People still read GoChiefs football opinions?

[ChiefMojo]

Yup typical Clay bullsh*t but SHOULD expected on this board. He is the master of the cherry pick info.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by saphojunkie

Read his sig. It's cherry picking. When an opponent scores more than 24 points, Alex Loses! AMIRITE?

Well, actually, that statistic means nothing if Alex Smith's team ALSO scored more than 24 points. If his team loses 48-45, then it would fall under Clay's "Statistical analysis" (see: bullshit), because Smith's team technically lost while the opponent scored over 24 points. But so did his team. So, if the defense had held the opponent to 24 points, he would have won, and Clay's point would be meaningless. Granted, this isn't true for all of these losses or even a majority, but even one contrary example shows the fallacy in relying on statistical propaganda, which is what the sig is.

Still, it's an arbitrary benchmark. He's using statistics to prove points he already believes. That's cherry picking. He would have you believe that the only thing you have to do is to beat Smith is score 24 points, because clearly he was incapable of leading his team to more than four scores in a game. Ever.

They make for great discussion, but it's annoying as **** to have to go and do the research just to disprove a bullshit theory that shouldn't have existed in the first place.

Sounds like Clay is keeping you on your toes. Good show.