|
09-03-2013, 03:52 PM | #1756 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Casino cash: $10010313
|
Quote:
I'm sure they installed a completely offense when Kaep took over as opposed to putting in a few new wrinkles. Sorry, not buying it. |
|
Posts: 2,454
|
09-03-2013, 03:52 PM | #1757 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
What is your point? Are you saying that because Smith beat them at the beginning of the season that it would have happened in the playoffs? The same playoffs where he had no receivers and no backup RB? The same playoffs where the defense fell apart and was nowhere near as good as they were at the beginning of the season? Try again.
|
Posts: 287
|
09-03-2013, 03:52 PM | #1758 | |
Still Got The Blues (For You)
Join Date: May 2013
Casino cash: $10014178
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 16,482
|
09-03-2013, 03:53 PM | #1759 | |
Still Got The Blues (For You)
Join Date: May 2013
Casino cash: $10014178
|
Quote:
Nice excuses. |
|
Posts: 16,482
|
09-03-2013, 03:54 PM | #1760 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2013
Casino cash: $10019798
|
Quote:
espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/95245/crabtree-harvin-and-2009-wr-draft-class[/url] The drops are cool when you are T.O. but when Crabtree was a mediocre at best #1 2009-2011, not so much. 2012 his drops dropped and was used much more in a better role for him, the slot. |
|
Posts: 1,532
|
09-03-2013, 03:54 PM | #1761 |
Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
No, you are done because you don't have an answer to my point. The 49ers did not "play it safe because of the WR talent", they played it safe because Smith does not take risks like Kaepernick does. Make sense yet?
|
Posts: 165
|
09-03-2013, 03:54 PM | #1762 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
All you do is look at numbers that align with your distorted view of Smith and run with them. Instead of looking at them in context like most sane, intelligent people do. We're comparing which QB's are better and you're talking about the running game. It shows just how far off you are in this argument. |
|
Posts: 287
|
09-03-2013, 03:55 PM | #1763 | |
Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 165
|
09-03-2013, 03:56 PM | #1764 | |
Still Got The Blues (For You)
Join Date: May 2013
Casino cash: $10014178
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 16,482
|
09-03-2013, 03:56 PM | #1765 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
|
Posts: 287
|
09-03-2013, 03:57 PM | #1766 | |
Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 165
|
09-03-2013, 03:59 PM | #1767 |
Still Got The Blues (For You)
Join Date: May 2013
Casino cash: $10014178
|
|
Posts: 16,482
|
09-03-2013, 03:59 PM | #1768 | |
Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 165
|
09-03-2013, 03:59 PM | #1769 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Casino cash: $10010313
|
Quote:
Yes, I'm talking about the running game. I'm sorry you don't understand how it relates to the QB...especially on a team that was relying the the Qb's presnap reads. Quote:
Yeah, cuz Alex couldn't beat GB the first time around in their house, right? |
||
Posts: 2,454
|
09-03-2013, 04:00 PM | #1770 |
Still Got The Blues (For You)
Join Date: May 2013
Casino cash: $10014178
|
If you don't think a QB has an important and direct impact on the run game, then I don't know what to tell you. Being able to read the D pre-snap and put the offense in the best situation for success each play? Yeah... that's kind of significant.
|
Posts: 16,482
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|