First Round Targets

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by kccrow

See, you should have listened to me on page 1. :P

I kid, but I do agree with you here. He seems like a Veach type and he's more of a SS to me which is precisely what the Chiefs need.

I think Dax Hill goes top 20 and no later than 21 to NE at this point, so who's that next safety? To me it's Cine.

I don't know that I think Brisker is a guy that's a round 1 player but I do like him quite a bit. Reminds me a ton of when Thornhill came out and I thought Thornhill was a R1 guy.

Lol

I don’t think you can go wrong with either of those 3. I’d prefer Hill, Cine, and Brisker in that order, but you can make an argument for any of them being a good pick at 30.

Cine would give us another big fast freak athlete inside like Sneed that tackles very well. I think he fits what we’re building with Bolton and Gay too.

Bolton, Gay, Sneed, and Cine just sounds right, doesn’t it?

[kccrow]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Lol

I don’t think you can go wrong with either of those 3. I’d prefer Hill, Cine, and Brisker in that order, but you can make an argument for any of them being a good pick at 30.

Cine would give us another big fast freak athlete inside like Sneed that tackles very well. I think he fits what we’re building with Bolton and Gay too.

Bolton, Gay, Sneed, and Cine just sounds right, doesn’t it?

I'd be 100% on board with Cine if CB and DE aren't a major issue post-FA. Even then, he'd probably trump a good lot of those guys.

I have a hard time letting go of my love affair over Sam Williams, who I think is a R1 pick regardless of the sex thing.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by kccrow

I'd be 100% on board with Cine if CB and DE aren't a major issue post-FA. Even then, he'd probably trump a good lot of those guys.

I have a hard time letting go of my love affair over Sam Williams, who I think is a R1 pick regardless of the sex thing.

Yea, many things have to happen in free agency to take a safety in round 1.

I’d be fine with Sam Williams, and I’m very close to adding him to this list. Just need to see more buzz about him going that high, which I think will come.

[RunKC]

Not sure how Cine is in coverage but his tape looks good. He’s not making business decisions like Tyrann did

[Toad]

Cine is a guy I would love see in red and gold. Was hoping we would get a chance at him in the second but his combine performance shot a hole in that boat.

According to the reports I’ve read, Cine does have some opportunity to grow in pass coverage. Here is an excerpt for the Bleacher Report for what it’s worth:

“When playing the pass, Cine is more than capable of holding his own in man coverage. A smooth pedal paired with quick feet allows him to get out of breaks with decent speed. When in man coverage, he occasionally guesses the route and squats on routes. Further into it, he shows good timing and technique when breaking up passes. As a deep safety in zone coverage, he does a very good job playing the quarterback. His pedal allows him to gain ground, while his fluid hips allow him to open and run, and his ball skills allow him to attack it in the air.

[staylor26]

Also, Cine reportedly made all the calls and got everybody into position as the communicator on that Georgia defense.

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Also, Cine reportedly made all the calls and got everybody into position as the communicator on that Georgia defense.

Alright, then I'm out on Cine.

Because so help me God if I have to hear anything else about how important {insert mediocre player here} is because he 'lines everyone up on the defense' right before they forget to put 11 ****ing guys on the field, I'll lose my mind.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Alright, then I'm out on Cine.

Because so help me God if I have to hear anything else about how important {insert mediocre player here} is because he 'lines everyone up on the defense' right before they forget to put 11 ****ing guys on the field, I'll lose my mind.

I just thought it’s an interesting note considering he’d be replacing Tyrann. Certainly seemed like communication was an issue when he wasn’t on the field.

[JohnnyHammersticks]

Originally Posted by staylor26

...Certainly seemed like communication was an issue when he wasn’t on the field.

Yep, and tackling was an issue when he was on the field.

I'll be extremely disappointed if Mathieu plays another game for us. That's not the type of roster move you make when you're paying a franchise QB.

I'd love to see a guy like Cine take his place.

[Stryker]

Originally Posted by JohnnyHammersticks

Yep, and tackling was an issue when he was on the field.

I'll be extremely disappointed if Mathieu plays another game for us. That's not the type of roster move you make when you're paying a franchise QB.

I'd love to see a guy like Cine take his place.

Oh hell yes this...

[IMG][/IMG]

[Dante84]

Brisker vs. Cine - who you got?

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by Dante84

Brisker vs. Cine - who you got?

For me, Brisker.

I think he's a better coverage player; more in the FS mold. And while I respect Cine's physical tools and willingness to get physical, I just trend more towards the rangier safeties than the physical ones.

And Brisker isn't someone who shies away from contact in his own right.

I wouldn't draft either of them (won't take one in the first; won't be there in the 2nd), but if I had to choose one or the other, I'd take Brisker.

[staylor26]

Cine for me.

1. Hill
2. Cine
3. Brisker
4. Pitre

[Toad]

Hill…Cine…Pitre…Brisker

But, I also have a bit of a hard time taking anyone of those in the 1st.

[RunKC]

I feel like this thread will be useless in a month bc Veach is gonna go full Veach mode and trade the pick again