Chiefs sign former Bills Punter Matt Araiza

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by MMXcalibur

The position WAS a formality, with our offense A FEW YEARS AGO.

I mean, it was kindof a formality THIS year given the strength of our defense.

Put 'em at the 40 instead of the 30...who cares? Spags and the boys got this...

[Bob Dole]

Joshua Brisco is being a real snowflake over this.

[siberian khatru]

Originally Posted by Bob Dole

Joshua Brisco is being a real snowflake over this.

So what's his argument? That a mere accusation is sufficient to blackball somebody?

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by siberian khatru

So what's his argument? That a mere accusation is sufficient to blackball somebody?

It was hard to really tell over the sounds of him patting himself on the back so vociferously, but yeah that seemed to be the gist of it.

A) He's a punter.
B) We did this before the combine when it will be a topic of conversation.
C) The Chiefs have a history of issuing brief statements in these matters and moving on.
D) I mean maybe he didn't rape her, but she said some gross stuff and he appears to have had sex with her outside the party at some point prior to the events in question.
E) Not guilty isn't the same as innocent.
F) This is all very gross and I'm just too pure to have to speak to such grossness.

It was ridiculously self-righteous tripe.

[Go Royals]

Originally Posted by siberian khatru

So what's his argument? That a mere accusation is sufficient to blackball somebody?

Him and Taylor arguing and laughin about the agency statement that "our client has been through hell" was pretty telling from the two of them. Optics of an accusation - be it true, false, or otherwise - outweighs the fact that in their own account of the events that they read earlier in the show proved that he was falsely accused.

Just honestly pretty gross behavior from people who act above everyone else by being just gobstruck that they have to lower themselves to talking about the details and what actually happened at all.

[Bob Dole]

Originally Posted by siberian khatru

So what's his argument? That a mere accusation is sufficient to blackball somebody?

That’s pretty much it. “Well, there are questions still…”

What ****ing questions? The guy was cleared.

[frozenchief]

Originally Posted by Bob Dole

That’s pretty much it. “Well, there are questions still…”

What ****ing questions? The guy was cleared.

‘The DA said that video showed Ariaza wasn’t there when these events happened so technically he was cleared but still…”

Really?!?

How about this: “A bank teller sued Nate Taylor for emotional distress and putting a gun in her face when he robbed the bank with Chiefsaholic. The US Attorney’s office declined to prosecute because video of the robbery showed he was not there at the time so Nate Taylor has technically been cleared but questions remain.”


They also complained that this woman’s lawyer said they dropped the case because she couldn’t afford the legal fees for the counter-suit. That is a load of crap. Representing her on the counter-suit is part and parcel of representing her as a plaintiff. It’s covered by the contingency. The lawyer will keep track of fees related to that for purposes of damages if she wins the lawsuit but you don’t drop the case because of that. You drop the case because it’s a dead-bang loser and you know it. You use the “legal fees” excuse tags a way to cover your ass.

The latest episode really pissed me off. They ask how KC fans are supposed to feel when Araiza booms a punt that pins an opposing team deep in their territory? I’m going to feel great that our team can avail themselves of his services after he was falsely accused of a crime, after he’s been to hell and back.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by Bob Dole

Joshua Brisco is being a real snowflake over this.

Link?

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Link?

There's a little hand-wringing at the beginning, but I'll just skip to right about the moment he mounts his soapbox and starts reading the article he wrote because "It's probably just the most appropriate way for me to do this..."

It was very cringe.

[GeorgeZimZam]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

There's a little hand-wringing at the beginning, but I'll just skip to right about the moment he mounts his soapbox and starts reading the article he wrote because "It's probably just the most appropriate way for me to do this..."

It was very cringe.

Very cringe indeed.

Nate Taylor and Josh Briscoe are lame AF. A good number of Chiefs e-celebs/podcasters would do well to decrease their soy intake significantly.

Even while silent, as Briscoe blathers away, Taylor grimaces and squirms around like he himself is vicariously enduring the lying whore's fake trauma.

[raybec 4]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

There's a little hand-wringing at the beginning, but I'll just skip to right about the moment he mounts his soapbox and starts reading the article he wrote because "It's probably just the most appropriate way for me to do this..."

It was very cringe.

That whole speech was just so goddamn self righteous. He's incredibly soft and completely full of shit.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by raybec 4

That whole speech was just so goddamn self righteous. He's incredibly soft and completely full of shit.

100% cuck.

[DJay23]

I like the inside the locker room bits Taylor brings about 5 times per season, and Keysor knows X's and O's well enough. Briscoe is an obnoxious douche who thinks he's the smartest guy in the room.

That podcast is good when they are actually talking about football (so only Nate and Seth), but when they are doing their ridiculous ad libs, annoying screechy voices, and going on non football tangents...yuck.

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by DJay23

I like the inside the locker room bits Taylor brings about 5 times per season, and Keysor knows X's and O's well enough. Briscoe is an obnoxious douche who thinks he's the smartest guy in the room.

That podcast is good when they are actually talking about football (so only Nate and Seth), but when they are doing their ridiculous ad libs, annoying screechy voices, and going on non football tangents...yuck.

They're up and down, for sure.

That was easily - EASILY - the worst show they've ever done even going back to their early Time's Ours day.

FFS the last 5 minutes were Brisco talking about his goddamn birdfeeder. It was horrible. If that were my introduction to that show, I'd have never even given it a 2nd chance.

If they insist on doing 2 episodes a week in the off-season and THAT'S the caliber of episode they're going to put out...don't.

[smithandrew051]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

They're up and down, for sure.

That was easily - EASILY - the worst show they've ever done even going back to their early Time's Ours day.

FFS the last 5 minutes were Brisco talking about his goddamn birdfeeder. It was horrible. If that were my introduction to that show, I'd have never even given it a 2nd chance.

If they insist on doing 2 episodes a week in the off-season and THAT'S the caliber of episode they're going to put out...don't.

They’re fortunate that YouTube started hiding the number of thumbs down.

They’re getting destroyed in the comments though. Deservedly so.