Reid says Geno not out of consideration for No. 1 overall

[SAUTO]

And you said there was NO WAY he signed for less than.7.5 per.

wrong.


said he was so great he would get no less than 3 years.

Wrong.

But in your words you were 110 percent right, huh?
Posted via Mobile Device

[SAUTO]

And people plot and scheme just as much here on the sticks dumbass.

Meth capitol...
Posted via Mobile Device

[B14ckmon]

Geno Smith + New jerseys for the Jaguars = Buying a pallet of them.

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Again you fail.

I'm not "from the sticks" douchebag.

I live in the sticks because I WANT it that way.

I grew up in armourdale.

my whole life. My whole family still lives there. My dad lives in the same house I grew up in.

I grew up on the streets. Crazy style.


True story. People plot, scheme, and **** each other over 24 7.

I live here because I wanted my children to be able to play in my front yard and not gave to worry about them getting shot.
Posted via Mobile Device

MY god did that point fly so far above your head......

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

And you said there was NO WAY he signed for less than.7.5 per.

wrong.


said he was so great he would get no less than 3 years.

Wrong.

But in your words you were 110 percent right, huh?
Posted via Mobile Device

That's a fraction of what I said. And he got in the ballpark of what I said.

Also, there were a lot of qualifiers in those statements.

For the idiots of the world, like yourself, are statements made within a statement that qualify the statement to be true, or false, based on parameters or variables.

Such as, "Danny Amendola will get signed by the Patriots IF (Qualifier) they let Welker walk and don't sign Edelman as his replacement, immediately (qualifier).

And so forth. Do yourself a favor when and look back at the Welker statement and pick out the qualifiers.

I wasn't making a statement as a "matter of fact" that he wont' take a deal under 3 years, or less than 7.5M per year. It was a statement loaded with qualifiers about the slot receiver market, and what the market would expect of a top tier slot receiver, and he got pretty damned close to that, despite COMPLETELY SURPRISING EVERYONE IN THE WORLD OF FOOTBALL AND FOOTBALL JOURNALISM. I was REALLY ****ing close to the mark on Welker, closer than most analysts were, and even they were shocked to see him sign a 2 year deal for less than 7.5Mil.

Even then, you'll have to forgive my memory, but I don't recall saying "Welker won't take a deal less than 3 years for less than 7.5 Million dollars per year", and if you can find me saying that EXACT statement, without qualifiers, without variables, and without interpretations, then I'll admit to being wrong, and that I was 110% right.

However.

The 110% RIGHT comment I rebuffed from your 110% wrong comment, stems from the fact that I described to you the events long before the happened, including names, teams, salary figures, and length of contract.

I was right about Welker signing and the situation following it. Amendola, Edelman, talib, etc.

Long before anybody spoke out about a Welker contract in popular media, I was suggesting 3 years @ 7.5M a year give or take the signing bonus and guaranteed money, and stated that almost all of the money would have to be guaranteed.

When I later found out that he had signed a 3 year contract, per schefter, I posted it. Moments later, he updated it to a 2 year, which I later corrected, and speculated that the contract would have to be nearly ALL guaranteed.

When the contract details came out the next day, I was right again.


So now, going back to the point of all of this.

You're calling me 110% wrong, because I speculated the events 110% right, but got the contract offer's off by 1 year and by 1M per year, less than 20% off of the numbers, before anything was reported.

And you're arguing this in a thread about speculating events.

Something I nailed in that thread where you call me 110% wrong.

Let me recap this.

You're arguing about a contract length and pay, in a thread speculating about events, something I proved to be right about, over and over again now. Sean Smith being the "Defensive player in the building", the players connected to the Welker deal and how that would break down, Dumervil's contract being all but done and agreed to (which you fault me for because they can't fax, but despite this, my comment was 110% true and unquestionably so).

So let me reiterate my point.

Andy Reid saying he isn't ruling out taking Geno Smith, is about as much concrete evidence as you'll ever get pre-draft that he has no intention of drafting Geno Smith, and every intention on trying to get more trade value out of that pick, than he'll get in player value in Geno Smith, or whomever he decides would or will be that selection.

If you disagree with my statement, I challenge you to give me information to the contrary.

Until then, Sauto, please learn how to contain yourself into one post, your enthusiasm for argument shows when you have to reply 3 times in a thread nobody has yet replied to.

There is an edit feature, use it.

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

And people plot and scheme just as much here on the sticks dumbass.

Meth capitol...
Posted via Mobile Device

On the sticks or in the sticks? Your grammar sucks.

Also, I didn't know the "sticks" referred to Independence.

[SAUTO]

Yeah this place makes independence look like amateurs.

ill get you that post and we will see the qualifiers about the contract.

I seem to remember a I've got special info here in that post.

Let me find it
Posted via Mobile Device

[SAUTO]

And lol with the "I was off on the years and the pay but I was 110 percent right about the events"


JFC dude
Posted via Mobile Device

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Yeah this place makes independence look like amateurs.

ill get you that post and we will see the qualifiers about the contract.

I seem to remember a I've got special info here in that post.

Let me find it
Posted via Mobile Device

Looks like we found plenty of qualifiers in that post, and you were wrong.

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

And lol with the "I was off on the years and the pay but I was 110 percent right about the events"


JFC dude
Posted via Mobile Device

JFC what?

YES OR NOT< was I not dead on ****ing accurate about EVERY player in that entire statement?

Feel free to quote the other statements that went along with it referencing Talib, Sean Smith, etc.

Dead ****ing nailed it, and you're bitching about the terms of his contract, as speculated by me, as later reported by schefter, later redacted by schefter.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Oh **** Welker in his donkey ass already...
Posted via Mobile Device

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie

Oh **** Welker in his donkey ass already...
Posted via Mobile Device

Tell that to Mr. Ignore List over there who can't ****ing drop it.

Nevermind the fact that I have this crazy ability to give insight into what teams are thinking and doing, and post them here for us to have a better insight into what is going to happen.

This bitch over here is going to ignore the fact that I was right about Welker, Amendola, Talib, Sean Smith, and Dumervil, and argue that my Years were wrong, which everyone got wrong, and I was off by 20% on the contract numbers, and then because someone in Denver didn't know how to fax, I was "wrong" despite the only thing I stated was that the financials were done, and they were. So I was actually right on that.

Sauto has a hardon for me, because he's a flaming homosexual from the sticks of Missouri.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

You two need Sake.
Posted via Mobile Device

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie

You two need Sake.
Posted via Mobile Device

I'm honestly not a fan of Sake. Give me some Whiskey and we'll see.

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by Exoter175

I'm honestly not a fan of Sake. Give me some Whiskey and we'll see.

theres some pretty good cold unfiltered sakes you might like

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

theres some pretty good cold unfiltered sakes you might like

I've heard that it tastes like dry white wine, which I'm tolerant of, just not a fan of. Everything else is like some concoction more relative to Port than anything. And I'm not a big fan of Port, not a huge fan of most wine in general.

Generally if I feel like having a nice, fancy drink, I go for the Cognac-Brandy types.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Swhiskey, then.
Posted via Mobile Device