WR in the 1st or the 2nd?

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by JBucc

Let's take Jarrett in the first, Gonzo II in the second, and Steve Smith in the third. Then trade Eddie for a 4th rounder and take Yamon Figures, then David Ball in the fifth. In the sixth and seventh take Steve Breaston and Aaron Fairooz. One of them should work out.

Next year: seven DT's.

In 22 years we'd have a hell of a team.

[bdeg]

Somebody tell the Lions. They'll do it.

[ct]

Decent list of the WR class this year.

http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/fea...rticleid=28028

[ct]

I still see outstanding WR value in the 2nd round, and directly because of that, highly doubt that any board @23 will have WR as BPA.

[Tribal Warfare]

Originally Posted by coryt

I still see outstanding WR value in the 2nd round, and directly because of that, highly doubt that any board @23 will have WR as BPA.

unless you are talking about Timmons or Revis who else??????? If Dwayne Jarrett is their who would be the BPA I'll be pissed off in the uptenth degree is KC doesn't select him

[ct]

I'm talking about the depth of quality WR prospects pushes them all down IMO. If you can get the same quality at 54 than 23 for a position, or even close to same quality, how the hell is that best value?

[Tribal Warfare]

Originally Posted by coryt

I'm talking about the depth of quality WR prospects pushes them all down IMO. If you can get the same quality at 54 than 23 for a position, or even close to same quality, how the hell is that best value?

question why take a chance, if that quality player isn't their, or BPA if the best player is a WR in both rounds then take a WR in both rounds.