What If The QBOTF Isn't There?

[The Rick]

Originally Posted by milkman

I like Flynn, what little we've seen, and if you gave me a choice between him, Cassel and Orton, I'd take Flynn, no questions asked, even without Clements.

But if you tell me I have a choice between Flynn and a first round QB, well that isn't even a close choice.

Flynn was a 7th round pick, wasn't he?

There's a reason for that.

Thank you! Spot on. Glad someone finally said this.

I don't understand all of the Flynn love, and I'm even living in the heart of Packer territory. Not saying he's bad, but he played (very well, I'll admit) in one game. There just isn't enough of a sample size to determine anything with him at this point.

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by The Rick

Thank you! Spot on. Glad someone finally said this.

I don't understand all of the Flynn love, and I'm even living in the heart of Packer territory. Not saying he's bad, but he played (very well, I'll admit) in one game. There just isn't enough of a sample size to determine anything with him at this point.

Again, I'm open to Flynn if and only if we have no intentions of actually drafting our own guy - and I'll admit, his appeal is as much about his play as it is about him learning under the best QB coach in the NFL and behind the best QB in the NFL.

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by milkman

I like Flynn, what little we've seen, and if you gave me a choice between him, Cassel and Orton, I'd take Flynn, no questions asked, even without Clements.

But if you tell me I have a choice between Flynn and a first round QB, well that isn't even a close choice.

Flynn was a 7th round pick, wasn't he?

There's a reason for that.

Total agreement.

I only mentioned Flynn because trading for backups seems to be Pioli's MO.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Total agreement.

I only mentioned Flynn because trading for backups seems to be Pioli's MO.

Flynn is a FA after this season.

Just FYI.

[BigCatDaddy]

Trade up?

[suds79]

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy

Trade up?

100% agree with this logic. If there's a guy you believe is going to be great, you make a move.

The good news is that there are a lot of teams drafting high that won't be interested in a QB.

Carolina, Jacksonville, Minn, etc

Could be costly. But get the guy you want.

[Quesadilla Joe]

I don't think the Chiefs have the staff necessary to develop a QB. Zorn is overrated, Flacco is meh and Jason Campbell is shit.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

I don't think the Chiefs have the staff necessary to develop a QB. Zorn is overrated, Flacco is meh and Jason Campbell is shit.

First of all, Zorn isn't overrated. Nobody in the league talks about him for him to be rated. Only Chiefs fans do.

Secondly, drafted QBs who go to teams without good coaching staffs do well all the time.

[The Bad Guy]

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

I don't think the Chiefs have the staff necessary to develop a QB. Zorn is overrated, Flacco is meh and Jason Campbell is shit.

What a load of dog shit this post is, again.

Like it takes some ****ing rocket scientist to develop a franchise QB. You really think that Mike Mularkey developed Matt Ryan? You probably couldn't name the QB coaches that Drew Brees, or Aaron Rodgers have had either.

[Jenson71]

Honestly, we never gave Brodie Croyle the chance to succeed here. I'm not opposed to drafting a QB in the later rounds (no higher than 3-4), but if we don't, we should talk to Croyle.

[suds79]

Originally Posted by Literature

Honestly, we never gave Brodie Croyle the chance to succeed here. I'm not opposed to drafting a QB in the later rounds (no higher than 3-4), but if we don't, we should talk to Croyle.

You're kidding right? Excuse me if there's sarcasm noted and I missed it.

[Jenson71]

Originally Posted by suds79

You're kidding right? Excuse me if there's sarcasm noted and I missed it.

I have my reasons. They're not exactly on-field football reasons, though.

[kcpasco]

Originally Posted by Literature

Honestly, we never gave Brodie Croyle the chance to succeed here. I'm not opposed to drafting a QB in the later rounds (no higher than 3-4), but if we don't, we should talk to Croyle.

We got Stanzi here who nobody knows if he can get it done because the staff won't give him a chance. And you wanna bring Croyle back? Lol

Brodie had his chance

[Fansy the Famous Bard]

Originally Posted by Literature

Honestly, we never gave Brodie Croyle the chance to succeed here. I'm not opposed to drafting a QB in the later rounds (no higher than 3-4), but if we don't, we should talk to Croyle.

Seriously? Darn near every time Brodie took the field it ended with an injury. That's not something you can have at QB. There is a reason Croyle is getting cut from other teams.

He's not the sharpest tool in the shed. And that's being nice.

[WV]

Originally Posted by Literature

Honestly, we never gave Brodie Croyle the chance to succeed here. I'm not opposed to drafting a QB in the later rounds (no higher than 3-4), but if we don't, we should talk to Croyle.