Mo. woman wins $5.8M in 'Girls Gone Wild' case

[listopencil]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Maybe because this wasn't a situation where her tit popped out because she chose to wear something that didn't cover her properly. She was at a bar, and someone pulled her top down. It's pretty clear from the pictures that she was making an (admittedly drunken) attempt at pulling her top up and covering up.

Because she is suing, people all jump her case for it. If this was just some random dude in the bar who came up and pulled your wife's top down, filmed it, and sold the video for millions of dollars, I'm sure everyone would feel a little differently about it.

Because there was some sign saying that GGW is there, "she was asking for it". People are ****ing stupid.

^

[Lumpy]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Maybe because this wasn't a situation where her tit popped out because she chose to wear something that didn't cover her properly. She was at a bar, and someone pulled her top down. It's pretty clear from the pictures that she was making an (admittedly drunken) attempt at pulling her top up and covering up.

Because she is suing, people all jump her case for it. If this was just some random dude in the bar who came up and pulled your wife's top down, filmed it, and sold the video for millions of dollars, I'm sure everyone would feel a little differently about it.

Because there was some sign saying that GGW is there, "she was asking for it". People are ****ing stupid.

To clarify, I'm not completely opposed to her seeking legal action. Good for her if she thinks she can pull it off. But w/ her being in a bar w/ GGW filming, I just don't see how she could NOT know that her ta-tas could be exposed. She was a victim of her surroundings. For example, if you don't want to get shot, don't go to a bad part of town.

[Valiant]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Maybe because this wasn't a situation where her tit popped out because she chose to wear something that didn't cover her properly. She was at a bar, and someone pulled her top down. It's pretty clear from the pictures that she was making an (admittedly drunken) attempt at pulling her top up and covering up.

Because she is suing, people all jump her case for it. If this was just some random dude in the bar who came up and pulled your wife's top down, filmed it, and sold the video for millions of dollars, I'm sure everyone would feel a little differently about it.

Because there was some sign saying that GGW is there, "she was asking for it". People are ****ing stupid.

The problem is you are going after the wrong person and so is she.. Was it as ggw employee?? It is not their fault it happened, they were filming.. She is not suing the guy that did it, she is suing ggw..

So if someone depants me at a bar or outside, some other random person videos it, uploads it to youtube and makes millions on the advertisement from clicks I can sue them??

And where did I say she deserved it?? Unless the person was a ggw employee, ggw did not anything wrong.. They were video taping live at a bar..

[Lumpy]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

It isn't a live event. GGW edited the tape to ensure her conclusion.

That's pretty irresponsible of them.

GGW deserved the hit. In the grand scheme of things, it's pocket lint for Joe Francis and ultimately it will keep him from being as reckless in the future.

I'm well aware of how they're produced and you're right, (to an extent). They included her in the final production and that shouldn't have happened. I also thought that I read that she didn't sign the waiver. If that's the case, she definitely shouldn't have been included in the vid.

However, consider that the majority of these girls are probably under the influence of alcohol when they sign the waiver. That in itself should be scrutinized.

[Fairplay]

Originally Posted by Lumpy

I think the lawsuit is BS.

Too late, she's already won the big bucks, the tall dollars, rolling in the dough, laughing all the way to the bank, living on easy street, shes made of money, rolling in the green, worth a bundle, well off, loaded, got it made, prosperous, in the money, she has the big kahunas, hit the payday, found the golden ticket, coming up roses, filthy rich, hit the goldmine, pelthora of riches, glutton of money, money over floweth, won the sweepstakes, hit the big score, and rich as king Midas do you need more descriptions?

[Lumpy]

Originally Posted by Fairplay

Too late, she's already won the big bucks, the tall dollars, rolling in the dough, laughing all the way to the bank, living on easy street, shes made of money, rolling in the green, worth a bundle, well off, loaded, got it made, prosperous, in the money, she has the big kahunas, hit the payday, found the golden ticket, coming up roses, filthy rich, hit the goldmine, pelthora of riches, glutton of money, money over floweth, won the sweepstakes, hit the big score, and rich as king Midas do you need more descriptions?

No, sir. No need for more descriptions. I'm aware that she won. However, the company behind GGW is trying to overturn the verdict, so it sounds like the lawsuit is far from being over.

[Valiant]

Was it in a public setting when filmed? Did the guy that dropped her top work for ggw? if the guy was a randm person, then it is not ggw problem. It was filmed at a bar, she knew she would be on film if at the bar. Ggw is only at fault if their guy assualted her.

If the verdict stands, lots of people/paparazzi and companies are going to be sued.

[ArrowheadHawk]

Anybody got the video?

[big nasty kcnut]

My question is if the jury favored ggw in the first case then what right does a judge have to not heed a jury ruling and retry a case.

[OnTheWarpath15]

NSFW.

http://imgur.com/a/29C3B/jane_doe039...ity_girls_orgy

[Valiant]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

NSFW.

http://imgur.com/a/29C3B/jane_doe039...ity_girls_orgy

Yeah, those faces afterwards do not seem like a no face..

[Papi]

Originally Posted by Valiant

Yeah, those faces afterwards do not seem like a no face..

This. Times 5.8 million

[sedated]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

NSFW.

http://imgur.com/a/29C3B/jane_doe039...ity_girls_orgy

She doesn't seem very upset.

Oh, and...not bad.

[Lumpy]

Originally Posted by sedated

She doesn't seem very upset.

Oh, and...not bad.

I agree that she doesn't look upset. She has the, "hey, guys, check out these fun-bags", look in every pic.

No comment on her boobs.

I honestly cringe every time I see a GGW commercial. I always wonder how many dads buy those DVD's and see their daughter's goods?

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Lumpy

I agree that she doesn't look upset. She has the, "hey, guys, check out these fun-bags", look in every pic.

Really? Which pic is it where she isn't either covering up or pulling her top back up?