****MNF****Panthers vs Patriots****

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by GoChargers

Not holding.

Apparently you don't watch too many Chiefs games.

[Anyong Bluth]

Originally Posted by jd1020

Not holding.

Apparently you don't watch too many Chiefs games.

That's a "good job, buddy" hug.
Tamba gets them all the time.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by GoChargers

[Amnorix]

Originally Posted by GoChargers

You see several of those a games, on both sides. I specifically saw Denver do it to the Chiefs on Sunday night, in fact.

For good or for bad, what most would think is holding is pretty rampant. It's more about how long you hold for, rather than IF you hold, that results in it getting called.

Of course, the Chargers have been the NFL's butt-monkeys for years, so I'm not surprised at your bitterness.

[Dylan]

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

Gronk could have come back to catch the ball, which Kuechly did not allow him to do by pushing him away from the ball.

NFL Rule Book: Pass Interference

The restriction for the passing team starts with the snap. The restriction on the defensive team starts when the ball leaves the passer’s hand. Both restrictions end when the ball is touched by anyone."

It is pass interference by either team when any player movement beyond the line of scrimmage significantly hinders the progress of an eligible player of such player’s opportunity to catch the ball.

Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to:

(a) Contact by a defender who is not playing the ball and such contact restricts the receiver’s opportunity to make the catch.

(c) Grabbing a receiver’s arm(s) in such a manner that restricts his opportunity to catch a pass.

(d) Extending an arm across the body of a receiver thus restricting his ability to catch a pass, regardless of whether the defender is playing the ball.

(e) Cutting off the path of a receiver by making contact with him without playing the ball.

http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/passinterference

['Hamas' Jenkins]

A team that won a Super Bowl due to a ruling that had essentially never once been called before loses a chance to win a regular season game over a controversial call?

[notorious]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

A team that won a Super Bowl due to a ruling that had essentially never once been called before loses a chance to win a regular season game over a controversial call?

This.

Cry me a mother-****ing river,NE.

[Amnorix]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

A team that won a Super Bowl due to a ruling that had essentially never once been called before loses a chance to win a regular season game over a controversial call?

Yeah, not true, for the record. Believe the tuck rule had been called earlier that same year.

But you have a story to spin and hate the Patriots, so don't let facts get in your way.

Odd that Jon Gruden is over the tuck rule, but you're not...

[kcpasco]

I am pretty sure the old arm around the neck routine is not considered holding in the NFL.
Just ask Hali

[Sorter]

Oh, COME ON jd.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by Sorter

Oh, COME ON jd.

Sorry.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by jd1020

Sorry.

[Nightfyre]

Originally Posted by jd1020

Sorry.

And with this post, I vote we transform this thread into a random gif thread!



Yes... I googled random gif and got this.

[kcpasco]

A properly placed headlock is not holding.

[dannybcaitlyn]

It would have been interesting who would have won the last play at the 1 yrd line if the penalty stood up.