Sub-forum decision

We have 4 sub-forums stuck at the top of the page. We need to add a "Games" sub-forum during the season for all our Gambling, pick'em, score, fantasy, etc. games which accompany the regular season.

I don't want more than 4 sub-forums at the top, so one of them needs moved. Which one?

[Logical]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

What comments?

I think people are reading into it what they want to read...

Just a few

Originally Posted by shakesthecat

DC is a waste of bandwidth and drive space.

Next Donger quoting the shakes quote above

Originally Posted by Donger

I would tend to agree. It's become rather pathetic.

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

DC has become a pathetic joke. I still wander over to be amused on occaision, but it's certainly not our best "side".....make people dig for it a bit, if they are looking for a circle jerk.

Originally Posted by chagrin

The whole thing seems to be one or two people arguing semantics with everyone who disagrees with them, it's a friggin neverending cycle of angry, insulting banter.
...

That in the first 14 posts I could go on and on but that takes a lot of time.

[Logical]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Um, I thought you were against such things.

I guess I was right, wasn't I? This is about REVENGE.

In all honesty Parker it cannot be about revenge for me so that sort of shoots that theory. The only thing I am doing is trying to prevent the death of the forum.

[HemiEd]

Vote for the DC forum, do not come here for politics. Posted their once.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

Just a few

Shakes is hardly a hardline conservative posting in DC.

Donger is.

Kotter, well, nevermind.

I don't know about chagrin.

You've basically got 1. There's 52 votes up there.

[Raiderhater]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Shakes is hardly a hardline conservative posting in DC.

Donger is.

Kotter, well, nevermind.

I don't know about chagrin.

You've basically got 1. There's 52 votes up there.

And not even the one conservative who wants it nuked says it is because his side is "losing". Mere conjecture and speculation.

[Logical]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Shakes is hardly a hardline conservative posting in DC.

Donger is.

Kotter, well, nevermind.

I don't know about chagrin.

You've basically got 1. There's 52 votes up there.

I said nothing about them being posters in DC, shakes is a conservative, kotter despite what he says is a conservative, Donger is a conservative. I could have added alichiefs but I just think he is weird, not sure what affiliation to assign him to, and my only statement is the conservatives no longer have their way so they want to see DC closed and that many people just cannot handle seeig DEnise/jettio/jAZ names up their as poster. I have no idea why just seeing those names bothers so many people so much.

[Logical]

Originally Posted by HemiEd

Vote for the DC forum, do not come here for politics. Posted their once.

Actually you have posted there 4 times
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/searc...searchid=85602

[Logical]

Originally Posted by raiderhader

And not even the one conservative who wants it nuked says it is because his side is "losing". Mere conjecture and speculation.

Jesus Christ, you expect them to admit that Jamie, be real.

[Raiderhater]

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

Jesus Christ, you expect them to admit that Jamie, be real.

Pardon me all to hell. I thought I was being real by assuming you did not have the ability to read minds and search the souls of men.

But I now stand corrected, and bow before the all knowing, God-like Logical.

I'm not the one that needs to get real here, ol' pal.

[Mr. Laz]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

I'm sorry, but the circumstantial evidence you point to is a number. There's no explanation of that number, who contributed to that number, or why they voted for that option in the 1st place.

In reality, it's not evidence. It's nothing.

You and your cohorts have arrived at said theory ALL BY YOURSELVES. I admonish you to point out ONE POST that even suggests conservatives want to "hide" DC because they're losing.

not really...

a DC forum full of conservatives disappear virtually all the in same day. Now tell me that's just some kind of uber coincedence.

all the conservatives who were fighting like hell to prevent even a split of the politics from the main forum ... then flooded it and controlled it for months if not years all of the suddenly hate they dam thing and want it moved ... if not deleted.

why the sudden change of heart ... the DC forum has always been a pissing match... what has changed?


why the extreme desire for it deleted or off the front page completely. i mean just moving the picture forum was enough ... seperation of the geek/games and all the other forums was enough.

but they can't even stand the sight of the DC link now ... why?

why not just not enter the DC forum?

[Logical]

Originally Posted by raiderhader

Pardon me all to hell. I thought I was being real by assuming you did not have the ability to read minds and search the souls of men.

But I now stand corrected, and bow before the all knowing, God-like Logical.

I'm not the one that needs to get real here, ol' pal.

Almost no one admits there wrong around here Jamie, me and a few other notable exceptions. But to actually admit being defeated I am sorry if it insults you but you are not being realistic if you expect to find a post admitting that. There actions disappearing from the forum and running away from it all of a sudden in the last week or two tell the story. Don't give me the football season nonsense either, these are the folks that are hardcore and were on the DC forum all last fall and winter.

[Stinger]

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

Again to the moderators I am sorry, I am talking about the intent of the voters not the intent of the moderators.

Oh lord he we go with voter intent, seems to me this board had this discussion back in November of 2000.

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

Funny thing is I don't see anybody posting being all that childish but the voters sure are.
.

So you can decipher what everones vote ment to them. That is truely amazing. If someone came up with a hanging chad ruling this thread would be the 2000 election in a nutshell.

[Simplex3]

Originally Posted by penchief

What high horse?

I'm only defending the tactics of those who fought fire with fire.

You KNOW, just KNOW, the motives of everyone that is no longer frequenting DC to have the same f**king arguments with the broken-record moonbats on this board. It's because you've decided they CAN'T defend Bush. You KNOW this for a FACT.

1. You can't prove Bush can't be defended
2. You can't prove why they aren't coming back

The point is that they left and now you guys are sad because saying the same s**t over and over isn't as much fun when there isn't someone to give different responses. Now that everyone over there is expressing their "views" from the same list of talking points it's a DU-style circle jerk.

I'd say the people that won are the ones that left.

[stevieray]

[QUOTE=penchief]

You will also notice that those who were targeted by those personal insults rarely fought back. Oh sure, there were times where the insults got to be a little much and the frustration showed but, all in all, the personal abuse seemed to be consistently espoused by one side.

QUOTE]

"inappropiate comment deleted"

I only see one "side' bringing their BS back to the main forum.


same as it ever was.

[Simplex3]

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

In all honesty Parker it cannot be about revenge for me so that sort of shoots that theory. The only thing I am doing is trying to prevent the death of the forum.

Who's killing it? We're just saying take the link off of the Lounge. Hell, I vehemently want it to survive so that terroristme stays off of the main board.