Okay, so WHAT exactly is so goddamn great about the 2018 QB class?

[notorious]

I'm excited for the QB that hasn't been born yet. Might as well wait it out.

[O.city]

Financially doesn't make sense if your QB has to sit for 2 years. You figure year 3 is then basically a rookie year, and your having to make decisions on a contract without really knowing what you've got.

I'm all for not playing a guy till he's ready, but if it's more than a year, I'm not interested. Especially for a first round pick.

[-King-]

Originally Posted by O.city

Financially doesn't make sense if your QB has to sit for 2 years. You figure year 3 is then basically a rookie year, and your having to make decisions on a contract without really knowing what you've got.

I'm all for not playing a guy till he's ready, but if it's more than a year, I'm not interested. Especially for a first round pick.

This.
Posted via Mobile Device

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by O.city

Financially doesn't make sense if your QB has to sit for 2 years. You figure year 3 is then basically a rookie year, and your having to make decisions on a contract without really knowing what you've got.

I'm all for not playing a guy till he's ready, but if it's more than a year, I'm not interested. Especially for a first round pick.

It's hard to find guys that are ready to go that quickly. If anything, a QB's first year or two won't be good anyway.

It's all about drafting good players most of the time. Hell Houston and Peters alone are going to cost a shit ton of $$ combined in 2-3 years.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by RunKC

It's hard to find guys that are ready to go that quickly. If anything, a QB's first year or two won't be good anyway.

It's all about drafting good players most of the time. Hell Houston and Peters alone are going to cost a shit ton of $$ combined in 2-3 years.

How many guys have had to sit 2 years? 1 year sure, although I still think you learn more by playing but a year is fine.

Every qb that has failed and has been said "if they'd have sit a year to be ready they'd have been good" has been on or in shitty situations

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by O.city

Financially doesn't make sense if your QB has to sit for 2 years. You figure year 3 is then basically a rookie year, and your having to make decisions on a contract without really knowing what you've got.

I'm all for not playing a guy till he's ready, but if it's more than a year, I'm not interested. Especially for a first round pick.

I'm not advocating for them to sit two years, sit one. But the next year there will probably be some growing pains.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

I'm not advocating for them to sit two years, sit one. But the next year there will probably be some growing pains.

Yeah and that's fine. Put a good d around him, better running game and the weapons they have and ease him in

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by O.city

Yeah and that's fine. Put a good d around him, better running game and the weapons they have and ease him in

So basically you are getting a jump start of a year if they think a guy this year is good enough

[The Franchise]

Give Kizer a year and he'll be ready to match and exceed our QBs 15 TDs.

[Eureka]

Chiefs could find their Carr. Why not draft 2 QB's if their there. Redskins did it in 2012 with RGIII and Cousins. Bottom line is the Chiefs need to try and develop their own QB.

In the Playoffs last year the Chiefs were the only team to play with a QB they didn't draft. Miami played with there backup who they didn't draft I believe. Tananhill who they drafted would've helped them as well as Carr would've improved the Raiders chances. I see a pattern here.

Patriots -Brady
Oakland-Cook
Steelers-Big Ben
Texans-Savage

Miamai-Moore (not drafted/not the starter)
Chiefs-Smith (not drafted)

Falcons-Ryan
Cowboys-Prescott
Packers-Rogers
Seahawks-Wilson
Lions-Stafford
Giants-Eli

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by Eureka

Chiefs could find their Carr. Why not draft 2 QB's if their there. Redskins did it in 2012 with RGIII and Cousins.Bottom line is the Chiefs need to try and develop their own QB.

In the Playoffs last year the Chiefs were the only team to play with a QB they didn't draft. Miami played with there backup who they didn't draft I believe. Tananhill who they drafted would've helped them as well as Carr would've improved the Raiders chances. I see a pattern here.

Patriots -Brady
Oakland-Cook
Steelers-Big Ben
Texans-Savage

Miamai-Moore (not drafted/not the starter)
Chiefs-Smith (not drafted)

Falcons-Ryan
Cowboys-Prescott
Packers-Rogers
Seahawks-Wilson
Lions-Stafford
Giants-Eli

Funny that you say that because I was thinking about this the other night. I wouldn't be upset at all if we used two picks on QB's like the Redskins did. Nothing wrong with hedging your bets at that position.

[Rain Man]

The greatest thing about the future is hope. All is possible in the future.

[kcchiefsus]

**** that. Take someone this year and someone else next year if we have to. This next year shit needs to end now.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus

**** that. Take someone this year and someone else next year if we have to. This next year shit needs to end now.

There's 0% chance of that happening though.

We're looking at another Geno this year if we reach.

[SAGA45]

Originally Posted by ASS11

There's 0% chance of that happening though.

Speaking strictly in terms of the first round, perhaps. But in the entire draft, I don't think it's a stretch at all to say the Chiefs take a QB in '17 AND '18 for reasons I mentioned earlier.