Who to draft in 2010

[ChiefsCountry]

I know the safeties get the most love from this board bc they make the most sense for the Chiefs but Carlos Dunlap is the best prospect or will be by the time April comes around. But sadly he doesn't fit our system.

Now for O-Line, I like Ciron Black out of LSU. Perfect right tackle, I think he will be available at either the Atlanta pick or ours in the 3rd round.

[Mecca]

The Chiefs have no use for Dunlap now because they desire to play 3-4.

[Red Coater]

so who is the best rush LB for us to take?

[Tribal Warfare]

On a sidenote it did bother the **** out of me that Albert was beat on a speed rush

[Ebolapox]

honestly, you have to take berry or mays if they're the best players on the board. offensive line isn't great, but albert (if he gets over his mental block/focusing on technique instead of playing instinctively), and waters are 2/5 of a good line (waters is replaceable, though, possibly by darryl harris). we need a center, nduckwe is serviceable at guard (niswanger may be serviceable at guard), so at very least we need a center and a Rt. we can get a decent to good RT in the second-fourth round. we need another WR. we need linebackers out the ass. my dream draft (with no particular guys in mind)

1) playmaking safety (berry or mays)
2) rushbacker (OLB)
2) RT/C (you can get one of the better guys in the draft at either position here)
3) WR
4) RT/C (whichever you didn't get in second round)
5-7) BPA (need linebackers, o-line depth, another wr maybe, maybe a te, QB, etc)

[Red Coater]

cant we all just get along

[ChiefsCountry]

I pimped for the whole ****ing line in this draft you little ****ing dumb ****ing Willard piece of shit, so go **** yourself

[LiL stumppy]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

I pimped for the whole ****ing line in this draft you little ****ing dumb ****ing Willard piece of shit, so go **** yourself

Ouch, someones angry

[L.A. Chieffan]

the first pick we should pick a guy and then with the 2 pick we should pick another guy. that would be awesome

[Red Coater]

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan

the first pick we should pick a guy and then with the 2 pick we should pick another guy. that would be awesome

Hell Yea

[Chiefnj2]

I really hate the argument "how many championships did we win with a dominant OL in the 90's."

Other than a really good OL, what else don't we need?

We didn't win any championships with Allen or DT, so I guess KC doesn't need a good pass rusher.

We didn't win any championships with TG, so I guess we don't need a really good TE.

We didn't win any championships with Saleamua on the line, so I guess we don't need a NT.

We didn't win any championships with Carter and Hasty at CB, so I guess we don't need any really good corners.

We didn't win any championships with Cherry or Albert, so I guess we don't need any really good DBs.

We didn't win any championships with Holmes, so I guess we don't need a HB who can score 20+ TDs a year.

We don't have any of the above, so I guess we're set. We'll start winning real soon.

[LiL stumppy]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

I really hate the argument "how many championships did we win with a dominant OL in the 90's."

Other than a really good OL, what else don't we need?

We didn't win any championships with Allen or DT, so I guess KC doesn't need a good pass rusher.

We didn't win any championships with TG, so I guess we don't need a really good TE.

We didn't win any championships with Saleamua on the line, so I guess we don't need a NT.

We didn't win any championships with Carter and Hasty at CB, so I guess we don't need any really good corners.

We didn't win any championships with Cherry or Albert, so I guess we don't need any really good DBs.

We didn't win any championships with Holmes, so I guess we don't need a HB who can score 20+ TDs a year.

We don't have any of the above, so I guess we're set. We'll start winning real soon.

lmao,great post

[Rudy tossed tigger's salad]

For all the talk of position value last year with Curry and then eventually Jackson, why does it seem like some of the same people are petitioning for Mays and Berry? Has the following been said here?

You just don't take a safety in the top 5. JFC. Do you realize you are potentially guaranteeing more than double the amount of guarantees set in the current contracts of Sanders, Reed, and Polamalu?/CP draft expert

I know they are playmakers but.....

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by Lemon_Pie

For all the talk of position value last year with Curry and then eventually Jackson, why does it seem like some of the same people are petitioning for Mays and Berry? Has the following been said here?

You just don't take a safety in the top 5. JFC. Do you realize you are potentially guaranteeing more than double the amount of guarantees set in the current contracts of Sanders, Reed, and Polamalu?/CP draft expert

I know they are playmakers but.....

As opposed to guaranteeing more than double (and in many cases triple) the amount of guarantees set in the current contracts of every 3-4 DE not named Seymour?

And Jackson's not even a playmaker.

We're going to be overpaying whoever we draft, so might as well get the guy that can actually make plays.

[Rudy tossed tigger's salad]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

As opposed to guaranteeing more than double (and in many cases triple) the amount of guarantees set in the current contracts of every 3-4 DE not named Seymour?

And Jackson's not even a playmaker.

We're going to be overpaying whoever we draft, so might as well get the guy that can actually make plays.

Just sayin....and I agree about Jackson....but it's amazing how that drafting philosophy suddenly gets thrown out the window. Typically safeties stay out of the top 10 and those who were fortunate enough to crack it, haven't lived up to expectations. No pun intended for Taylor

FTR, I like both Berry and Meys.... and would be ok with either... but to criticize others for wanting to draft a LT over a safety is ridiculous by your own standards