NBA Off-season 2016 thread

[mcaj22]

Chandler Parsons might get the max from Portland

21 million a year for 50 games a season, bad knees, and a guy who is never healthy for the playoffs. Thats what you pay for in the NBA I guess in 2016.

[Hydrae]

Originally Posted by mcaj22

Chandler Parsons might get the max from Portland

21 million a year for 50 games a season, bad knees, and a guy who is never healthy for the playoffs. Thats what you pay for in the NBA I guess in 2016.

And what they really need is better defense. They will not be getting that from Parsons.

[Al Bundy]

Whiteside staying in Miami.

[DaKCMan AP]

Originally Posted by Al Bundy

Whiteside staying in Miami.

[-King-]

Dear DeRozan staying in Toronto for 5 years $139 mil. I can't imagine how excited KCC is by this.
Posted via Mobile Device

[bricks]

Originally Posted by -King-

Dear DeRozan staying in Toronto for 5 years $139 mil. I can't imagine how excited KCC is by this.
Posted via Mobile Device

I'm buying him a jersey

[Titty Meat]

Lakers lost

[Sassy Squatch]

Probably going to sound like a stupid question, but what's wrong with the Lakers? Seems like they can't even get a seat at the table for the top FAs.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

Probably going to sound like a stupid question, but what's wrong with the Lakers? Seems like they can't even get a seat at the table for the top FAs.

Have to question the guy driving the buss

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

Probably going to sound like a stupid question, but what's wrong with the Lakers? Seems like they can't even get a seat at the table for the top FAs.

Little Jimmy.

The only saving grace for the Mozgov deal (and really, there isn't one), is that at least it isn't a max deal so it's not tied to the cap. DeRozan's deal will go up with the cap, so will anybody else that gets a max contract (and I think there's a 'mini-max' that's also tied).

So Mozgov's deal, as frighteningly shitty as it is now, will get slightly less shitty next year when the cap goes up by about 20% and then slightly less shitty the year after that before it can be traded away as an expiring in year 4.

It's a bad bad BAD ****ing deal, but when the smoke clears, there will be worse given out over the next year or two.

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Little Jimmy.

The only saving grace for the Mozgov deal (and really, there isn't one), is that at least it isn't a max deal so it's not tied to the cap. DeRozan's deal will go up with the cap, so will anybody else that gets a max contract (and I think there's a 'mini-max' that's also tied).

So Mozgov's deal, as frighteningly shitty as it is now, will get slightly less shitty next year when the cap goes up by about 20% and then slightly less shitty the year after that before it can be traded away as an expiring in year 4.

It's a bad bad BAD ****ing deal, but when the smoke clears, there will be worse given out over the next year or two.

Is there a chance to rid themselves of him? Seems like a total dipshit.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Little Jimmy.

The only saving grace for the Mozgov deal (and really, there isn't one), is that at least it isn't a max deal so it's not tied to the cap. DeRozan's deal will go up with the cap, so will anybody else that gets a max contract (and I think there's a 'mini-max' that's also tied).

So Mozgov's deal, as frighteningly shitty as it is now, will get slightly less shitty next year when the cap goes up by about 20% and then slightly less shitty the year after that before it can be traded away as an expiring in year 4.

It's a bad bad BAD ****ing deal, but when the smoke clears, there will be worse given out over the next year or two.

It seems like the key is to the NBA is not to have an idiot son named Jimmy that inherits his fortune.

[bricks]

Raptors have to re-sign Biyombo now. Or else I may have to find a new father.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

I don't know which is worse, the Parsons deal or Mozgov getting 4/64 from the Lakers.

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

I don't know which is worse, the Parsons deal or Mozgov getting 4/64 from the Lakers.

If Parsons actually gets the max, it has to be Parsons given the escalator clauses in the contract.

At that point, the (presumably) Blazers don't even get an advantage of a long-term contract discount because it will go up with the cap.

Like I said, at least Mozgov's deal will get progressively less shitty. Parson's would actually get worse.