|
|
![]() |
#1 |
▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓
Join Date: Jan 2009
Casino cash: $-1494257
|
Why would it force teams to go for two? You make no sense.
__________________
🏁 |
Posts: 65,489
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Fantastic Planeteer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Champaign, IL
Casino cash: $10006721
|
Uh, no. A team would have the option of taking a free point, or going for two. It wouldn't force anything.
|
Posts: 4,943
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Debunking your bullshit
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: KC area
Casino cash: $3630890
|
The extra point is a worthless play. If they can do it successfully 99.9% of the time, it might not be worth doing.
This is a little confusing: "It's automatic that you get seven points when you score a touchdown, but you could potentially go for an eighth point, either by running or passing the ball, so if you fail, you go back to six." So a TD is worth 7. Then you can go for an extra point via run or pass, but if you fail, you lose a point? That seems too weird.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
Posts: 52,592
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Immanentize The Eschaton
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Partibus Infidelium
Casino cash: $-1124120
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 56,897
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Debunking your bullshit
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: KC area
Casino cash: $3630890
|
Quote:
But, I suppose the current kicking of the EP is about the same as a free point when they make it 99.9% of the time. Going for two is about like taking a free one off the board. Hmmm... So it's about the same deal but "seems" different.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
||
Posts: 52,592
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Immanentize The Eschaton
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Partibus Infidelium
Casino cash: $-1124120
|
Quote:
Pretty much. It's virtually the same gamble as now, but you eliminate the "gimme" play and just go kick the ball off. I think game flow would be better. |
|
Posts: 56,897
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Debunking your bullshit
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: KC area
Casino cash: $3630890
|
Not that I care about Goodell, but he's not in charge. He doesn't change shit unless the owners want him to change it.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
Posts: 52,592
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
hoc impetu faciendo non stabit
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Los Angeles, California
Casino cash: $3049675
|
How will it force teams to go for two? You get seven automatically. But if you go for two and fail, you get six. Same as now, only you just don't have to kick the extra point if you are ok with 7.
|
Posts: 39,025
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Mindful Taoist German
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $6491662
|
So much for the "integrity of the game."
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Posts: 78,118
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|