Browns sign Kareem Hunt

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Also, if you keep Hunt and Hill, no way you trade for Clark.

Clark >>>>> Hunt

Literally ZERO evidence of this. You could make the argument that there’s no way we trade for Clark if we keep Hill, but we did.

It’s an emotional argument without merit.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Literally ZERO evidence of this. You could make the argument that there’s no way we trade for Clark if we keep Hill, but we did.

It’s an emotional argument without merit.

Lol ok.

I’m sure this team would’ve still traded for Clark if they had Hill and Hunt. They didn’t even know about the audio tape before they made the trade. Now I REALLY know you’re a ****ing moron.

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Lol ok.

I’m sure this team would’ve still traded for Clark if they had Hill and Hunt. They didn’t even know about the audio tape before they made the trade. Now I REALLY know you’re a ****ing moron.

They would have. Reid does not give a ****, unless you lie to him repeatedly.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

They would have. Reid does not give a ****, unless you lie to him repeatedly.

Oh look another moron. It’s not about Reid. It’s about Clark. There’s absolutely no chance that would’ve happened.

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Oh look another moron. It’s not about Reid. It’s about Clark. There’s absolutely no chance that would’ve happened.

How is it not about Reid? He has final say. He runs the show. He's the one bringing in players like Hill and Clark in the first place. He made the trade and gave Clark that giant contract a month after it was known that Hill was under investigation.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by Superturtle

How is it not about Reid? He has final say. He runs the show. He's the one bringing in players like Hill and Clark in the first place. He made the trade and gave Clark that giant contract a month after it was known that Hill was under investigation.

If that doesn't make it clear that the Chiefs don't actually GAF, I don't know what does. They made a stupid, emotional decision that may very well bite them in the ass.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Lol ok.

I’m sure this team would’ve still traded for Clark if they had Hill and Hunt. They didn’t even know about the audio tape before they made the trade. Now I REALLY know you’re a ****ing moron.

So, again, you have ZERO evidence.

You seem to have also missed this question amid your various emotionally-driven insults:

Did the Patriots give a shit about Gronk, Edelman, and Harrison’s incidents? How about Dillon, Haynesworth, and Talib? These are just off the top of my head. If you want to extend it to drugs and other violent offenses, the list gets insanely longer.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

So, again, you have ZERO evidence.

You seem to have also missed this question amid your various insults:

Did the Patriots give a shit about Gronk, Edelman, and Harrison’s incidents? How about Dillon, Haynesworth, and Talib? These are just off the top of my head. If you want to extend it to drugs and other violent offenses, the list gets insanely longer.

How many of those guys hit women and a viral video went around causing outrage?

And I don’t need evidence to say it’s very unlikely the Chiefs would’ve traded for Clark if they held onto both Hunt and Hill after their situations and releasing of video/audio tapes that went viral and caused public outrage.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by staylor26

How many of those guys hit women and a viral video went around causing outrage?

And I don’t need evidence to say it’s very unlikely the Chiefs would’ve traded for Clark if they held onto both Hunt and Hill after their situations and releasing of video/audio tapes.

You very clearly don't "need" evidence for any of your takes.

Way to move the goalposts, though. Previously, your only concern was with domestic violence, which the Patriots very clearly have zero issue with. Now, it's very specific violence with very specific evidence of that violence. Given that those names were off the top of my head, I have no idea how many hit women (it's probably at least TWO of them) or how many include videos.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

You very clearly don't "need" evidence for any of your takes.

Way to move the goalposts, though. Previously, your only concern was with domestic violence, which the Patriots very clearly have zero issue with. Now, it's very specific violence with very specific evidence of that violence. Given that those names were off the top of my head, I have no idea how many hit women (it's probably at least TWO of them) or how many include videos.

I’m not moving goalposts you ****ing moron. I thought it was common knowledge that violence against women (especially with tapes attached) is the thing that causes the most public outrage. Nobody gives a **** about the other stuff. Hunt wouldn’t have been cut if he did something those guys did. Shit, he wouldn’t have even been cut if it were a guy. It wouldn’t even be a story for longer than a day. Those situations are clearly not relevant, but you’re too dense to see that.