|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-23-2022, 12:21 PM | #2 |
Three-Pat
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Casino cash: $385053
|
I think a couple more rings with Reid/Mahomes in the next 5-6 years will do it for me. What the Patriots did is so unusual that they can’t be looked at as a standard for what a dynasty is.
|
Posts: 17,946
|
11-23-2022, 12:22 PM | #3 |
Politically Incorrect
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Casino cash: $1291110
|
Patriots, Chicago Bulls, Pittsburgh Penguins, Edmonton Oilers, NY Yankees are the ones who come to mind of true dynasties.
__________________
"The only difference between sex for free and sex for money is that sex for free costs you a WHOLE LOT more!" ~Redd Foxx~ "The men who drafted Patrick Mahomes" |
Posts: 52,040
|
1 0 |
11-23-2022, 12:22 PM | #4 |
Three-Pat
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Casino cash: $385053
|
|
Posts: 17,946
|
11-23-2022, 12:23 PM | #5 |
Politically Incorrect
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Casino cash: $1291110
|
We need 3 or 4 more Super Bowl victories under Mahomes for that to be bestowed upon us.
__________________
"The only difference between sex for free and sex for money is that sex for free costs you a WHOLE LOT more!" ~Redd Foxx~ "The men who drafted Patrick Mahomes" |
Posts: 52,040
|
11-23-2022, 12:24 PM | #6 |
Politically Incorrect
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Casino cash: $1291110
|
__________________
"The only difference between sex for free and sex for money is that sex for free costs you a WHOLE LOT more!" ~Redd Foxx~ "The men who drafted Patrick Mahomes" |
Posts: 52,040
|
11-23-2022, 12:25 PM | #7 |
Politically Incorrect
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Casino cash: $1291110
|
San Antonio Spurs too
__________________
"The only difference between sex for free and sex for money is that sex for free costs you a WHOLE LOT more!" ~Redd Foxx~ "The men who drafted Patrick Mahomes" |
Posts: 52,040
|
11-23-2022, 12:26 PM | #8 |
Suupraa Geniuuusss
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Casino cash: $470400
|
According to most of the pundits, 3 Rings in 10 years is the standard for a team to be called a dynasty. I guess I agree with that.
__________________
“Some ideas are so stupid only intellectuals believe them.”- George Orwell Steven "Spags" Spagnuolo is my Adopt-A-Chief!!! |
Posts: 31,786
|
3 0 |
11-23-2022, 12:26 PM | #9 |
Politically Incorrect
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Casino cash: $1291110
|
Montreal Canadians and Boston Celtics
__________________
"The only difference between sex for free and sex for money is that sex for free costs you a WHOLE LOT more!" ~Redd Foxx~ "The men who drafted Patrick Mahomes" |
Posts: 52,040
|
11-23-2022, 12:27 PM | #10 |
Three-Pat
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Casino cash: $385053
|
|
Posts: 17,946
|
11-23-2022, 12:28 PM | #11 | ||
Grand champ
Join Date: Sep 2007
Casino cash: $602369
|
Quote:
Oof, those are some steep requirements. Hypothetical: what if we win a Super Bowl this year and next, but no more. So Super Bowl wins from the 2019, 2022 and 2023 seasons. Would we be considered a dynasty in your book? Quote:
Hypothetical: what if the couple more rings come at the end of that 5-6 years you’ve laid out? So we’ve got Super Bowl wins from the 2019, 2027 and 2028 seasons? Would we still be considered a dynasty in your eyes? |
||
Posts: 45,350
|
11-23-2022, 12:28 PM | #12 |
Three-Pat
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Casino cash: $385053
|
|
Posts: 17,946
|
11-23-2022, 12:31 PM | #13 | |
Three-Pat
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Casino cash: $385053
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 17,946
|
1 0 |
11-23-2022, 12:31 PM | #14 | |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $10229900
|
Quote:
4 Super Bowl appearances, 3 wins, and most likely 6 straight AFCCG's at Arrowhead. That is the definition of dynasty. |
|
Posts: 100,036
|
1 0 |
11-23-2022, 12:32 PM | #15 | |
Grand champ
Join Date: Sep 2007
Casino cash: $602369
|
Quote:
Hmm. 3 championships in 10 years is news to me. I usually hear 3 in 5 and I think I prefer that because I think I’d need the core of the team to be largely the same in order to consider it a dynasty. For example, what if the Packers had been able to win a Super Bowl with Favre and whoever their coach was in 2002 then they won the Super Bowl again in 2010 and 2011 with Aaron Rodgers and Mike McCarthy? Would that really be considered a dynasty? I don’t think I like that. |
|
Posts: 45,350
|
|
|