Is Ty Law a Bust?? - Page 3

**Lzen** · 10-23-2006, 04:29 PM

Halfcan,
you're and idiot.

Direckshun · 10-23-2006, 07:06 PM

Absolutely not. Ty has been worth it. Our pass defense has been elevated from joke-worthy to fearsome. Ty has been no small part of that.

They don't keep track of coverage sacks, but if they did, our secondary has a bundle so far. Plummer, Rivers, Leinart, and Smith have been hit a few times more than they should because Law's secondary has shut down all passing lanes.

Law himself has intercepted a couple so far, six games into the season. One of them helped defeat the Cards. Very good.

And he plays every down against the opponent's most talented receiver. Against San Diego, it was often one-on-one while everybody else attacked the line, so he had to play very conservatively, and he never once gave up a huge TD. (The LT touchdown was blown coverage on the right flank; Law was on the other side of the field.)

I'd blame him and the entire Chiefs secondary for their pitiful performance against the Steelers, but I'd rather erase that game from my mind.

The only game (other than Pittsburgh) where Law got beat with any consistency was against Denver's Jevon Walker, who's burning everybody right now. Law played him as well as anybody in the league could and Walker still found ways to win.

Other than that, Law has been A-list. His low tackles is proof that opposing teams would rather throw to Surtain (who's playing well too FWIW).

headsnap · 10-23-2006, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun

Other than that, Law has been A-list. His low tackles is proof that opposing teams would rather throw to Surtain (who's playing well too FWIW).

Bartee was always a top tackler...

case closed!

Direckshun · 10-23-2006, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by headsnap

Bartee was always a top tackler...

case closed!

Halfcan · 10-23-2006, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun

Absolutely not. Ty has been worth it. Our pass defense has been elevated from joke-worthy to fearsome. Ty has been no small part of that.

They don't keep track of coverage sacks, but if they did, our secondary has a bundle so far. Plummer, Rivers, Leinart, and Smith have been hit a few times more than they should because Law's secondary has shut down all passing lanes.

Law himself has intercepted a couple so far, six games into the season. One of them helped defeat the Cards. Very good.

And he plays every down against the opponent's most talented receiver. Against San Diego, it was often one-on-one while everybody else attacked the line, so he had to play very conservatively, and he never once gave up a huge TD. (The LT touchdown was blown coverage on the right flank; Law was on the other side of the field.)

I'd blame him and the entire Chiefs secondary for their pitiful performance against the Steelers, but I'd rather erase that game from my mind.

The only game (other than Pittsburgh) where Law got beat with any consistency was against Denver's Jevon Walker, who's burning everybody right now. Law played him as well as anybody in the league could and Walker still found ways to win.

Other than that, Law has been A-list. His low tackles is proof that opposing teams would rather throw to Surtain (who's playing well too FWIW).

Well said-so why have people bitched about TY since we got him. How many post popped up after the Cincy game that he was playing back too far. How many about falling down and also the Penalty against SD. It is a fair question to ask considering some of the comments around here. Is he worth it??

Direckshun · 10-23-2006, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan

so why have people bitched about TY since we got him. How many post popped up after the Cincy game that he was playing back too far. How many about falling down and also the Penalty against SD. It is a fair question to ask considering some of the comments around here. Is he worth it??

Why did people bitch about Law after the Cincy game? After the SD penalty?

Because people are fickle twerps whose allegiances and opinions will change on a dime.

They know no true loyalty, but instead impatiently denounce even the tiniest flaws they see as apocalyptic.

Don't listen to these people. You don't jump on a guy for one bad game or one bad play (if Law's Cincy game could even be called bad--I'd make the opposite case).

He's worth it. Not only that, he's extremely worth it. He's the leader of our revamped defense, and the crown jewel in Gunther's cover 2.

Hootie · 10-23-2006, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan

Well said-so why have people bitched about TY since we got him. How many post popped up after the Cincy game that he was playing back too far. How many about falling down and also the Penalty against SD. It is a fair question to ask considering some of the comments around here. Is he worth it??

what the **** are you talking about?

People have been all over Surtain...Law has gotten praise from just about everyone.

**Rausch** · 10-24-2006, 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

what the **** are you talking about?

People have been all over Surtain...Law has gotten praise from just about everyone.

****ing n00bs.

The important thing isn't who you bitch at, or why, only that you bitch incessantly...

**petegz28** · 10-23-2006, 07:51 PM

This has to be the dumbest thread on here in a long time.

Deberg_1990 · 10-23-2006, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

This has to be the dumbest thread on here in a long time.

I agree...lets just put Warfield and Bartee back in there again...

End of thread..

Halfcan · 10-23-2006, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

This has to be the dumbest thread on here in a long time.

Since this place drooled over Ty for two freakin years, we finally get him, Jets trolls jumped all over us saying he is going to suck, and now the D is playing respectable football-I thought it was a valid question.

I think he has done a nice job-wish they would send him on corner blites a few more times this year-he has the technique to really make a big play and get to the QB.

I rewatched a few games-and it seems he has released his guy a few times thinking a safety was there-Now is that Ty's fault or Sammys??

**KcMizzou** · 10-23-2006, 08:05 PM

A bit like asking if Ryan Sims should be a pro-bowler.

Hootie · 10-23-2006, 08:24 PM

someone should take away halfcan's thread-making privileges...

Hootie · 10-23-2006, 08:49 PM

halfcan is too friggin' dense to understand a cover 2 defense.

He watches the replay and is like, "holy shit! Law just let that guy run by him after 10 yards!" not realizing that the cover 2 calls for the corner to release the receiver to the safeties after a certain amount of yards.

boogblaster · 10-23-2006, 10:54 PM

Law has slowed some..but his presence makes QBs look-off most of the recievers hes covering..plus hes a plus for our youth on the team..and in the locker-room....

10-23-2006, 04:29 PM	#1
Lzen Banded Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Oz Casino cash: $-709308	Halfcan, you're and idiot. __________________ Conversation would be vastly improved by the constant use of four simple words: I do not know.
Posts: 42,485

10-23-2006, 07:06 PM	#2
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $2033447	Absolutely not. Ty has been worth it. Our pass defense has been elevated from joke-worthy to fearsome. Ty has been no small part of that. They don't keep track of coverage sacks, but if they did, our secondary has a bundle so far. Plummer, Rivers, Leinart, and Smith have been hit a few times more than they should because Law's secondary has shut down all passing lanes. Law himself has intercepted a couple so far, six games into the season. One of them helped defeat the Cards. Very good. And he plays every down against the opponent's most talented receiver. Against San Diego, it was often one-on-one while everybody else attacked the line, so he had to play very conservatively, and he never once gave up a huge TD. (The LT touchdown was blown coverage on the right flank; Law was on the other side of the field.) I'd blame him and the entire Chiefs secondary for their pitiful performance against the Steelers, but I'd rather erase that game from my mind. The only game (other than Pittsburgh) where Law got beat with any consistency was against Denver's Jevon Walker, who's burning everybody right now. Law played him as well as anybody in the league could and Walker still found ways to win. Other than that, Law has been A-list. His low tackles is proof that opposing teams would rather throw to Surtain (who's playing well too FWIW).
Posts: 59,693

10-23-2006, 07:51 PM	#9
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $-1145873	This has to be the dumbest thread on here in a long time.
Posts: 132,519

10-23-2006, 08:05 PM	#12
KcMizzou Supporter Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Parkville MO Casino cash: $10005170	A bit like asking if Ryan Sims should be a pro-bowler.
Posts: 54,695

10-23-2006, 08:24 PM	#13
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	someone should take away halfcan's thread-making privileges...
Posts: 56,356

10-23-2006, 08:49 PM	#14
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	halfcan is too friggin' dense to understand a cover 2 defense. He watches the replay and is like, "holy shit! Law just let that guy run by him after 10 yards!" not realizing that the cover 2 calls for the corner to release the receiver to the safeties after a certain amount of yards.
Posts: 56,356

10-23-2006, 10:54 PM	#15
boogblaster MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Verdigris Valley Campsite Casino cash: $10004900	Law has slowed some..but his presence makes QBs look-off most of the recievers hes covering..plus hes a plus for our youth on the team..and in the locker-room....
Posts: 10,305