Chiefs Agree with Harris - Page 6

RedThat · 03-06-2007, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp

If we have a LB lineup of DJ-Edwards-Harris, we are going to fucking blow against the run.

Stopping the run > stopping the pass.

And we are going to blow against the run if we don't address the DT positions. No matter who we have lining up at LB.

Mr. Laz · 03-06-2007, 12:52 PM

signing a less talent guy can work out IF you put him him a system that specifically targets his strengths.

(see the patriots)

but putting a guy into a system that doesn't fit him is a bad thing.

signing a lesser talent and then putting that lesser talent into a system that emphasizes his weaknesses is simply "retarted"

Chiefs Pantalones · 03-06-2007, 12:53 PM

Would Mitchell be good in Bell's place or should be sign someone else?

Archie Bunker · 03-06-2007, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder

Would Mitchell be good in Bell's place or should be sign someone else?

I think he would be a better fit at OLB than MLB in this scheme. He would be better than Bell no doubt in my mind.

nychief · 03-06-2007, 12:54 PM

I can't believe the amount of bitching already.

Mr. Laz · 03-06-2007, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief

I can't believe the amount of bitching already.

oh hush ...... people are discussing

or can't you tell the difference?

Chiefs Pantalones · 03-06-2007, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief

I can't believe the amount of bitching already.

No one's really bitching, we just don't know what we're going to do with the other LB spot. Edwards is too old and is a MLB, and would Kawika do well in place of Bell? I'm not a fan of putting a MLB at OLB.

Eleazar · 03-06-2007, 12:58 PM

htismaqe · 03-06-2007, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanilla Thunder

No one's really bitching, we just don't know what we're going to do with the other LB spot. Edwards is too old and is a MLB, and would Kawika do well in place of Bell? I'm not a fan of putting a MLB at OLB.

There are some very good OLB's that will be around when we pick in both the 1st and 2nd...much deeper field than MLB.

Chiefs Pantalones · 03-06-2007, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

There are some very good OLB's that will be around when we pick in both the 1st and 2nd...much deeper field than MLB.

Starting calibre?

Sure-Oz · 03-06-2007, 12:54 PM

Harris>Kavvvvveka

ChiefsCountry · 03-06-2007, 12:58 PM

Pollard is perfect for an outside linebacker in the Cover 2. Heck I went back and read his scouting reports from the draft and said he should move to lb in a cover 2.

Archie Bunker · 03-06-2007, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Pollard is perfect for an outside linebacker in the Cover 2. Heck I went back and read his scouting reports from the draft and said he should move to lb in a cover 2.

I wouldn't mind this move one bit.

Mr. Laz · 03-06-2007, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Pollard is perfect for an outside linebacker in the Cover 2. Heck I went back and read his scouting reports from the draft and said he should move to lb in a cover 2.

possible .... i remember some rumors about Pollard being moved maybe.

but i still think that means we need to change our scheme so that the MLB doesn't drop into deep coverage so much. IMO it's a bad thing anyway.

asking a player to be a main focus of stopping the run AND then asking the player to be responsible for the deep middle on passing players is just begging for problems in coverage.

Zouk · 03-06-2007, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz

possible .... i remember some rumors about Pollard being moved maybe.

but i still think that means we need to change our scheme so that the MLB doesn't drop into deep coverage so much. IMO it's a bad thing anyway.

asking a player to be a main focus of stopping the run AND then asking the player to be responsible for the deep middle on passing players is just begging for problems in coverage.

The only position Pollard could possibly play is WLB, which happens to also be our only good linebacker's position.

People say you need small guys for a scheme that plays a lot of cover 2 and cover 3, but Herm took John Lynch (who many said was too slow to be a safety and should be converted to linebacker) and made him very effective at strong safety in this scheme.

What's wrong with a bigger, physical defense? We're not a dome team. I like Johnson at WLB, Harris at MLB, and my guess is Fox gets his shot at SLB. Pollard and Page at safeties (although Knight might get one more year).

03-06-2007, 12:52 PM	#2
Mr. Laz Don't Tease Me Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: KS Casino cash: $11047037	signing a less talent guy can work out IF you put him him a system that specifically targets his strengths. (see the patriots) but putting a guy into a system that doesn't fit him is a bad thing. signing a lesser talent and then putting that lesser talent into a system that emphasizes his weaknesses is simply "retarted" __________________
Posts: 95,626

03-06-2007, 12:53 PM	#3
Chiefs Pantalones GO CHIEFS!!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $6868717	Would Mitchell be good in Bell's place or should be sign someone else? __________________ Don't be fooled by my username, I'm white.
Posts: 26,653

03-06-2007, 12:54 PM	#5
nychief MVP Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NYC Casino cash: $5329466	I can't believe the amount of bitching already. __________________ Good Time Charlie, Uncle Doobie and the Great Frisco Freakout.
Posts: 8,177

03-06-2007, 12:58 PM	#8
Eleazar Beyond the Rapids Join Date: May 2003 Location: Langley, VA Casino cash: $-370000	.,., Last edited by Eleazar; 06-26-2014 at 01:23 PM..
Posts: 80,659

03-06-2007, 12:58 PM	#12
ChiefsCountry The Insider Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Lake of the Ozarks Casino cash: $-1671248	Pollard is perfect for an outside linebacker in the Cover 2. Heck I went back and read his scouting reports from the draft and said he should move to lb in a cover 2.
Posts: 52,213