NFL Draft Bradford Please - Page 5

**MahiMike** · 01-08-2009, 11:05 PM

My choice is Bradford too. Of all the throws I saw tonite, His were all right on the money or damn close to it. Neither pick was his fault. Unlike Tebow who stared down his guys and threw right to the defense. I'd be ok w/Bradford.

Mr. Arrowhead · 01-08-2009, 11:10 PM

Memo to Detroit
Just look at the stats they are undeniable, how can you not draft Bradford, you dont want Stafford.

RustShack · 01-08-2009, 11:11 PM

He played like Stafford does all year, under pressure and WR's not playing all that great. Difference is Stafford does a better job playing under pressure and doesn't play in the spread offense. Oh he also has the physical tools Bustford doesn't have.

crazycoffey · 01-08-2009, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

He played like Stafford does all year, under pressure and WR's not playing all that great. Difference is Stafford does a better job playing under pressure and doesn't play in the spread offense. Oh he also has the physical tools Bustford doesn't have.

does this have to turn into a bradford vs. stafford debate? Most of us are saying Bradford impressed us tonight, did better than we expected, surprised us. Nothing you or I say will influence our draft pick. Instead, maybe stay on topic and talk about how/why Bradford didn't impress you. Nothing to do with IF he's better than stafford, or anyone else.

For now anyway, just a thought....

smittysbar · 01-08-2009, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

He played like Stafford does all year, under pressure and WR's not playing all that great. Difference is Stafford does a better job playing under pressure and doesn't play in the spread offense. Oh he also has the physical tools Bustford doesn't have.

That is the dumbest ****ing thing I have seen. You have no clue what he is, no one does. He is my 3rd favorite QB in the draft (if all come out), but just because I like a couple guys before him does not make him a bust. He can make the throws, is a great athlete, and has a good head on his shoulders. Had two picks tonight, that I wouldn't credit to him. Kid has game, don't know if it will translate to the NFL, but either do you.

I was watching at the bar, and thinking the whole time, that this place would probably be giving him some props. Well ****, I should have knew better then that.

This was a hell of a game, if you like someone else better, fine. Come on guys, give credit where credit id due.

**KcMizzou** · 01-08-2009, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smittysbar

That is the dumbest ****ing thing I have seen. You have no clue what he is, no one does. He is my 3rd favorite QB in the draft (if all come out), but just because I like a couple guys before him does not make him a bust. He can make the throws, is a great athlete, and has a good head on his shoulders. Had two picks tonight, that I wouldn't credit to him. Kid has game, don't know if it will translate to the NFL, but either do you.

I was watching at the bar, and thinking the whole time, that this place would probably be giving him some props. Well ****, I should have knew better then that.

This was a hell of a game, if you like someone else better, fine. Come on guys, give credit where credit id due.

It's kinda "all or nothing" here. We deal in extremes.

My personal wish list is...

Sanchez
Stafford
Bradford

But to be honest, I'd be excited about any of those 3. It's about time the Chiefs went "balls out" and went after a franchise QB.

smittysbar · 01-08-2009, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou

It's kinda "all or nothing" here. We deal in extremes.

My personal wish list is...

Sanchez
Stafford
Bradford

But to be honest, I'd be excited about any of those 3. It's about time the Chiefs went "balls out" and went after a franchise QB.

Exactly, I'm not understanding the whole - I like this guy so that guy ****ing sucks, sure bust.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 01-08-2009, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smittysbar

Exactly, I'm not understanding the whole - I like this guy so that guy ****ing sucks, sure bust.

I can't say Bradford is going to be a bust, but if I'm a GM, I'm not making a $60M investment in a kid that is going to have to be taught how to take snaps from center, learn 3, 5 and 7 step drops and actually read a defense, pre and post snap.

Sanchez
Stafford

Bradford

beach tribe · 01-08-2009, 11:20 PM

I've been blasting Bradford all season. I had watched some of his games, and it always seemed as if he was throwing to a spot on the field. Today he threw some good balls into tight coverage, His receivers let him down a few times, and he still gets flustrated under pressure, but I don't fear us selecting him near as much. The kid has talent, and he did take some snaps from under center. I won't flip if puts on the ketchup, and mustard.

L.A. Chieffan · 01-08-2009, 11:25 PM

Mr. Kotter · 01-08-2009, 11:25 PM

L.A. Chieffan · 01-08-2009, 11:25 PM

TEbow all the way homie. Duel threat FTW

Mr. Kotter · 01-08-2009, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan

TEbow all the way homie. Duel threat FTW

Maybe we can get Switzer to be the HC. The return of the "Option" in the NFL...we can lead the movement, baby!!!!

L.A. Chieffan · 01-08-2009, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

Maybe we can get Switzer to be the HC. The return of the "Option" in the NFL...we can lead the movement, baby!!!!

Id be down, harcore thugs and and Jesus is how we do it

okcchief · 01-08-2009, 11:33 PM

I would be happy with any of the three. Any of them could be good. Any of them could be a bust.

Time will tell.

01-08-2009, 11:05 PM	#1
MahiMike He's Mahomie! Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Jax, FL Casino cash: $10023443	My choice is Bradford too. Of all the throws I saw tonite, His were all right on the money or damn close to it. Neither pick was his fault. Unlike Tebow who stared down his guys and threw right to the defense. I'd be ok w/Bradford.
Posts: 17,387

01-08-2009, 11:10 PM	#2
Mr. Arrowhead MVP Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wichita Casino cash: $10015708	Memo to Detroit Just look at the stats they are undeniable, how can you not draft Bradford, you dont want Stafford.
Posts: 7,763

01-08-2009, 11:11 PM	#3
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $3006954	He played like Stafford does all year, under pressure and WR's not playing all that great. Difference is Stafford does a better job playing under pressure and doesn't play in the spread offense. Oh he also has the physical tools Bustford doesn't have. __________________
Posts: 15,126

01-08-2009, 11:20 PM	#9
beach tribe Keep doubting J MFing Houston Join Date: May 2007 Location: ft.lauderdale Casino cash: $3868036	I've been blasting Bradford all season. I had watched some of his games, and it always seemed as if he was throwing to a spot on the field. Today he threw some good balls into tight coverage, His receivers let him down a few times, and he still gets flustrated under pressure, but I don't fear us selecting him near as much. The kid has talent, and he did take some snaps from under center. I won't flip if puts on the ketchup, and mustard.
Posts: 21,429

01-08-2009, 11:25 PM	#10
L.A. Chieffan PLAY GOOD FOOTBALL Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: American Gardens Building Casino cash: $2678654
Posts: 17,400

01-08-2009, 11:25 PM	#11
Mr. Kotter Self Ban Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: In some's minds... Casino cash: $3184285	__________________ Movin' On...
Posts: 46,966

01-08-2009, 11:33 PM	#15
okcchief MVP Join Date: Jul 2008 Casino cash: $9849890	I would be happy with any of the three. Any of them could be good. Any of them could be a bust. Time will tell.
Posts: 6,703