OK lets see it - Page 15

ChiefsCountry · 04-09-2009, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

I take back what I said about findthedr this offseason has been far worse.

No shit. At least he knew football, he just was a reerun about Trevor Laws.

Saccopoo · 04-09-2009, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

No shit. At least he knew football, he just was a reerun about Trevor Laws.

Trevor Laws? The Minnesota Mauler?! That dude was a killer. Always give it up for my Apple Valley homies! YO! Trevor Laws in da hooooouuuuuuussssse!!!!!!!!!

**The Franchise** · 04-09-2009, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo

Trevor Laws? The Minnesota Mauler?! That dude was a killer. Always give it up for my Apple Valley homies! YO! Trevor Laws in da hooooouuuuuuussssse!!!!!!!!!

YO! Trever Laws in da hoooooouuuuussseeeee.....................

with 12 tackles.

milkman · 04-09-2009, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

No shit. At least he knew football, he just was a reerun about Trevor Laws.

He liked Laws, but the primary reason he pimped him is because we were pimping Sedrick Ellis, and he wanted Jake Long, so he tried to sell us that piece of crap (Laws} as a legitimate alternative.

**Tribal Warfare** · 04-09-2009, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

I take back what I said about findthedr this offseason has been far worse.

Damn n00bs

philfree · 04-09-2009, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

I take back what I said about findthedr this offseason has been far worse.

LOL ..Gee who's the common denominator in that equation?

PhilFree

Mecca · 04-09-2009, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree

LOL ..Gee who's the common denominator in that equation?

PhilFree

The reeruns that keep showing up in this forum?

'Hamas' Jenkins · 04-09-2009, 02:53 PM

Or you just sit the QB for a year, you dumb mother****er. Because there is only one round of the draft and we cannot draft a RT any where but 3.

Of course, had we not traded for Sloppy Seconds Cassel, we could have just went Sanchez, Meredith in the first two rounds and fixed both for less money and gotten younger, but why do that when you can go with the incestuous route of the Parcells tree and all their cousin-****ing?

Saccopoo · 04-09-2009, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Or you just sit the QB for a year, you dumb mother****er. Because there is only one round of the draft and we cannot draft a RT any where but 3.

BUT PEOPLE SAID THAT THEY WOULDN'T DRAFT PHIL LOADHOLT EVEN IF HE WAS THE LAST TACKLE ON THE PLANET AND WE DIDN'T HAVE A TACKLE! AND HE'S THE BEST RT IN THE DRAFT!

Quote:

Of course, had we not traded for Sloppy Seconds Cassel, we could have just went Sanchez, Meredith in the first two rounds and fixed both for less money and gotten younger, but why do that when you can go with the incestuous route of the Parcells tree and all their cousin-****ing?

MEREDITH OVER LOADHOLT?! ARE YOU NUTS OR SOMETHING?!

milkman · 04-09-2009, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo

BUT PEOPLE SAID THAT THEY WOULDN'T DRAFT PHIL LOADHOLT EVEN IF HE WAS THE LAST TACKLE ON THE PLANET AND WE DIDN'T HAVE A TACKLE! AND HE'S THE BEST RT IN THE DRAFT!

MEREDITH OVER LOADHOLT?! ARE YOU NUTS OR SOMETHING?!

No, dumbass, it was if he was the last OT.

****ing idiot.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-09-2009, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo

BUT PEOPLE SAID THAT THEY WOULDN'T DRAFT PHIL LOADHOLT EVEN IF HE WAS THE LAST TACKLE ON THE PLANET AND WE DIDN'T HAVE A TACKLE! AND HE'S THE BEST RT IN THE DRAFT!

MEREDITH OVER LOADHOLT?! ARE YOU NUTS OR SOMETHING?!

I guess there is no end or boundary to your idiocy.

Mecca · 04-09-2009, 02:54 PM

I think it's funny to see anyone act like Matt Cassel is a sure thing proven commodity.

Saccopoo · 04-09-2009, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

I think it's funny to see anyone act like Matt Cassel is a sure thing proven commodity.

Ditto for Sanchez. Even more so actually.

kcbubb · 04-09-2009, 03:32 PM

the point is that Cassel is easier to move on from. Both QBs could be busts. but if they are you aren't as committed to Cassel.

Cassel shows just as much upside to me as Sanchez and he is less risky. He's also cheaper. And you get to keep your #3 pick with Cassel.

Also, Sanchez is probably not the starter day one.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 04-09-2009, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcbubb

the point is that Cassel is easier to move on from. Both QBs could be busts. but if they are you aren't as committed to Cassel.

Cassel shows just as much upside to me as Sanchez and he is less risky. He's also cheaper. And you get to keep your #3 pick with Cassel.

Also, Sanchez is probably not the starter day one.

Who cares who the starter is next year? We're going to ****ing suck anyway.

And only a certifiably insane ****tard would argue that Matt Cassel has anywhere near the upside of Mark Sanchez.

04-09-2009, 02:53 PM	#8
'Hamas' Jenkins Now you've pissed me off! Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $7129572	Or you just sit the QB for a year, you dumb mother**er. Because there is only one round of the draft and we cannot draft a RT any where but 3. Of course, had we not traded for Sloppy Seconds Cassel, we could have just went Sanchez, Meredith in the first two rounds and fixed both for less money and gotten younger, but why do that when you can go with the incestuous route of the Parcells tree and all their cousin-**ing? __________________ "When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln
Posts: 75,083

04-09-2009, 02:54 PM	#12
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-782950	I think it's funny to see anyone act like Matt Cassel is a sure thing proven commodity.
Posts: 115,406

04-09-2009, 03:32 PM	#14
kcbubb Veteran Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $4936719	the point is that Cassel is easier to move on from. Both QBs could be busts. but if they are you aren't as committed to Cassel. Cassel shows just as much upside to me as Sanchez and he is less risky. He's also cheaper. And you get to keep your #3 pick with Cassel. Also, Sanchez is probably not the starter day one.
Posts: 2,561