Chiefs Chiefs lose to Denver and draft 3rd or 2nd - Page 4

Mecca · 12-27-2009, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz

Since his head is shove pretty much completely up his own ass ... his view is rather limited.

Oh Laz is here, hey Laz why don't you go **** off and die you stupid mother****er who does nothing but whine about the posters he doesn't like.

Oh no blah blah blah Mecca this OTW this that, seriously kill yourself ****in idiot.

Bunit · 12-28-2009, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Yeah, we saw your great WR analysis last year with Crabtree. Man, he sucks, huh?

Dez Bryant is a stud. I don't really want him because I think Berry is a bigger need.

But, you haven't exactly been spot on with your 'analysis'.

Orapko, Hali, Crabtree were all going to suck... and they have been far from that.

Sanchez was going to be great... and he has been far from it.

Clady was going to suck... yet.... he is outstanding.

Just wondering what exactly you look at when making your analysis.

Mother****er does not have an analysis. He just look for his favorite draft experts and also the expert that go against chiefs planet.

Or maybe it is his analysis, that is why he didn't come round here after the draft last year, because he is wrong. Either way he is proof skunks **** monkeys.

ps. did you rape yourself with that toilet brush yet?

James River · 12-28-2009, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Which one you taking because Dez Bryant has way to much Braylon Edwards in him for me to be saying hey top 5 pick do it.

Dez is much better than Braylon. To begin with, Dez never drops a pass. Braylon's biggest problem is dropped passes. I agree that Dez is a bit of a superstar, but most talented receivers are.

Dayze · 12-27-2009, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

They're going to go WR, IMO.

that would be interesting; to potentially have a legit big time WR.

Coogs · 12-27-2009, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze

that would be interesting; to potentially have a legit big time WR.

Not with Cassel chucking the rock. Hell, he couldn't make it work with Moss, and if he couldn't make it work with him, then what makes you think he could do it with one of the draft picks comming out?

Brock · 12-27-2009, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs

Not with Cassel chucking the rock. Hell, he couldn't make it work with Moss, and if he couldn't make it work with him, then what makes you think he could do it with one of the draft picks comming out?

What? Moss had 1000 yards and 11 TDs last year.

Pioli Zombie · 12-27-2009, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

What? Moss had 1000 yards and 11 TDs last year.

Don't bring facts into this.
Posted via Mobile Device

Coogs · 12-27-2009, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

What? Moss had 1000 yards and 11 TDs last year.

True, but they were not on the same page most of the season either. And that is not sight seen, that is just what I heard.

Hootie · 12-27-2009, 03:24 PM

take Berry #1

watch one of the QB's fall into the early 20s

trade up and take one

give cassel another shot at redemption...

if he sucks we have a fallback plan...and taking a QB after pick 20 is actually a cheap way to get a backup

Mecca · 12-27-2009, 03:27 PM

If they want a WR they should trade down for any deal they can get and take Williams.

KC kid · 12-27-2009, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

If they want a WR they should trade down for any deal they can get and take Williams.

Let me guess. . . USC?

Mecca · 12-27-2009, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC kid

Let me guess. . . USC?

Has nothing to do with him being from USC, anyone that has watched him knows, did you see him last night?

DrRyan · 12-28-2009, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Has nothing to do with him being from USC, anyone that has watched him knows, did you see him last night?

I did and he was a beast. The guy got good separation and showed great run after the catch. Mays, IMO, last night left more than a little to be desired. He seemed to always be getting to the pile just after the ball carrier/receiver was going down. I could probably get on board with taking Mays 15-20 range, but much earlier than that would not be my choice.

Titty Meat · 12-27-2009, 03:28 PM

There will be plenty of good Wr's in the 2nd round. I'd rather draft Berry or Spiller.

Pioli Zombie · 12-27-2009, 03:29 PM

So is Berry a sure bet Pro Bowl Palamulo/Sanders/Harrison game changer? If he is then its a good pick. But there is a doubt then no. What they should do is if they pick Berry they need to overpay and get Vince Wilfork too.
Posted via Mobile Device

12-27-2009, 03:24 PM	#9
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	take Berry #1 watch one of the QB's fall into the early 20s trade up and take one give cassel another shot at redemption... if he sucks we have a fallback plan...and taking a QB after pick 20 is actually a cheap way to get a backup
Posts: 56,356

12-27-2009, 03:27 PM	#10
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-742950	If they want a WR they should trade down for any deal they can get and take Williams.
Posts: 115,382

12-27-2009, 03:28 PM	#14
Titty Meat Inmem 2.0 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: My house Casino cash: $-1222442	There will be plenty of good Wr's in the 2nd round. I'd rather draft Berry or Spiller.
Posts: 78,161

12-27-2009, 03:29 PM	#15
Pioli Zombie Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: olathe,kansas Casino cash: $10004900	So is Berry a sure bet Pro Bowl Palamulo/Sanders/Harrison game changer? If he is then its a good pick. But there is a doubt then no. What they should do is if they pick Berry they need to overpay and get Vince Wilfork too. Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 11,077