If Berry is there and we pass - Page 7

Saccopoo · 02-14-2010, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Pioli is going to draft McClain, just get use to that idea because it's very likely.

Seeing as that would be the exact 2010 equivalent of drafting Jackson last year...

Saccopoo · 02-14-2010, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Depends on the position the player plays, a great WR on a team with no QB well he's not gonna perform all that highly.

Steve Largent does not approve of this message.

milkman · 02-14-2010, 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

Steve Largent does not approve of this message.

Jim Zorn was actually a pretty good QB, who would have had a lot more success playing on better teams.

Mecca · 02-13-2010, 07:13 PM

15 is a lot because in general value terms with contracts there are positions that aren't worth the pick let alone the player.

BigCatDaddy · 02-13-2010, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

15 is a lot because in general value terms with contracts there are positions that aren't worth the pick let alone the player.

If you are talking contact right out of the gate, no none of them are worth it, but if you just go back and say our team took x player at #5, then I can pull 15 guys from a draft where you give them an "A" for the pick 2-3 years down the road.

Mecca · 02-13-2010, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy

If you are talking contact right out of the gate, no none of them are worth it, but if you just go back and say our team took x player at #5, then I can pull 15 guys from a draft where you give them an "A" for the pick 2-3 years down the road.

I'd love to see you do that, I'd be willing to bet you'd list several guys that I would never put that high regardles.

BigCatDaddy · 02-13-2010, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

I'd love to see you do that, I'd be willing to bet you'd list several guys that I would never put that high regardles.

When I have more time I'll give it a shot.

kcxiv · 02-13-2010, 09:09 PM

Late on this, but it doesnt. They are in that position to make this team better, they dont go into the draft saying, imma pick this dude so our team can get worse.

I will give them a chance to see what they can do. I got no real choice anyways. I could get all pissed, but what the **** for? 5 years ago i probably would have, now? Do whatever they have to do to get this team better. After Hurricane CP cleared out, there needed to be much rebuilding to do.

KCDC · 02-13-2010, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv

Late on this, but it doesnt. They are in that position to make this team better, they dont go into the draft saying, imma pick this dude so our team can get worse.

I will give them a chance to see what they can do. I got no real choice anyways. I could get all pissed, but what the **** for? 5 years ago i probably would have, now? Do whatever they have to do to get this team better. After Hurricane CP cleared out, there needed to be much rebuilding to do.

I, too, am trying to be stoic about this. Though I think Pioli had a bad draft last year, I just have to hope that they know what they are doing. I, too, want a playmaker, at any position. I'm going to try and be supportive of anyone they pick at #5.

The only way I will gush with excitement is if Pioli manages to somehow trade down and get us another second rounder. Then, he will be hero for a team that has so many needs, in my book anyway.

Mecca · 02-13-2010, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCDC

I, too, am trying to be stoic about this. Though I think Pioli had a bad draft last year, I just have to hope that they know what they are doing. I, too, want a playmaker, at any position. I'm going to try and be supportive of anyone they pick at #5.

The only way I will gush with excitement is if Pioli manages to somehow trade down and get us another second rounder. Then, he will be hero for a team that has so many needs, in my book anyway.

What if he trades down and we end up with just another bum?

Getting extra picks isn't the key to winning, the 49ers one year traded down 3 times and got Rashaun Woods out of the deal, that's a fail.

kcxiv · 02-14-2010, 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

What if he trades down and we end up with just another bum?

Getting extra picks isn't the key to winning, the 49ers one year traded down 3 times and got Rashaun Woods out of the deal, that's a fail.

But we arent the niners. They gambled and it didnt pay off. This whole thing is a ****ing crapshoot anyways. You just have to hope you land a guy that has the work ethic and wants to take it to the next level and you have to hope he's not injured.

We could gamble and it doesnt pay of, or we could gamble and it pays off. We just have to hope the guy they pick a guy thats goign to be good to great in the NFL.

KCDC · 02-13-2010, 11:28 PM

This is based on the view that there is a great deal of talent in the first two rounds. Hey, if nothing else, it is harder to screw up two picks than one.

Many of the guys projected for the Chiefs could be available in the mid-first round. So, my view is that I'd rather have two good players than one, even if that one has a chance to be a very good player at one position. Most anyone we take in the first two rounds will be an automatic upgrade over what we have currently (except at RB).

**Tribal Warfare** · 02-13-2010, 11:28 PM

If KC can't get Berry, then I believe that KC might draft Mays with the 5th overall pick

RustShack · 02-13-2010, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

If KC can't get Berry, then I believe that KC might draft Mays with the 5th overall pick

I'm still in the boat where I think Mays ends up with the better career.. so I wouldn't mind it.

Mr. Laz · 02-13-2010, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

If KC can't get Berry, then I believe that KC might draft Mays with the 5th overall pick

then i will be grabbing a rifle and shooting some muther fuggers.

Mays a 5?

omg, gawd dam retarted mofos

02-13-2010, 07:13 PM	#4
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-782950	15 is a lot because in general value terms with contracts there are positions that aren't worth the pick let alone the player.
Posts: 115,406

02-13-2010, 09:09 PM	#8
kcxiv In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Central Valley, Cali Casino cash: $8697996	Late on this, but it doesnt. They are in that position to make this team better, they dont go into the draft saying, imma pick this dude so our team can get worse. I will give them a chance to see what they can do. I got no real choice anyways. I could get all pissed, but what the **** for? 5 years ago i probably would have, now? Do whatever they have to do to get this team better. After Hurricane CP cleared out, there needed to be much rebuilding to do.
Posts: 29,111

02-13-2010, 11:28 PM	#12
KCDC Starter Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $9616110	This is based on the view that there is a great deal of talent in the first two rounds. Hey, if nothing else, it is harder to screw up two picks than one. Many of the guys projected for the Chiefs could be available in the mid-first round. So, my view is that I'd rather have two good players than one, even if that one has a chance to be a very good player at one position. Most anyone we take in the first two rounds will be an automatic upgrade over what we have currently (except at RB).
Posts: 886

02-13-2010, 11:28 PM	#13
Tribal Warfare Man of Culture Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Far Beyond Comprehension Casino cash: $-3077187	If KC can't get Berry, then I believe that KC might draft Mays with the 5th overall pick __________________
Posts: 43,463